ecosophia: (Default)
[personal profile] ecosophia
very up to dateWe are now in the fourth year of these open posts. When I first posted a tentative hypothesis on the course of the Covid phenomenon, I had no idea that discussion on the subject would still be necessary more than three years later, much less that it would turn into so lively, complex, and troubling a conversation. Still, here we are. Crude death rates and other measures of collapsing public health are anomalously high in many countries, but nobody in authority wants to talk about the inadequately tested experimental Covid injections that are the most likely cause; public health authorities government shills for the pharmaceutical industry are still trying to push through laws that will allow them to force vaccinations on anyone they want; public trust in science is collapsing; and the story continues to unfold.

So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before:

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry and its government enablers are causing injury and death on a massive scale. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its wholly owned politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here. 
 
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue. 

4. If you plan on making off topic comments, please go away. This is an open post for discussion of the Covid epidemic, the vaccines, drugs, policies, and other measures that supposedly treat it, and other topics directly relevant to those things. It is not a place for general discussion of unrelated topics. Nor is it a place to ask for medical advice; giving such advice, unless you're a licensed health care provider, legally counts as practicing medicine without a license and is a crime in the US. Don't even go there.


5. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religions, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules. 

6. Please don't just post bare links without explanation. A sentence or two telling readers what's on the other side of the link is a reasonable courtesy, and if you don't include it, your attempted post will be deleted.

Please also note that nothing posted here should be construed as medical advice, which neither I nor the commentariat (excepting those who are licensed medical providers) are qualified to give. Please take your medical questions to the licensed professional provider of your choice.


With that said, the floor is open for discussion. 
Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-08 03:37 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I am posting this LA Times article from a few months back to challenge our caption picture -

https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2024-10-14/covid-intelligence-iq-symptoms-booster-vaccine-health

"Don’t be stupid: Skipping your COVID booster could reduce your IQ"

and the claim is even backed by "studies" from england and norway !!!

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-08 07:29 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Lol. Those vaccines ARE the IQ test - take one and fail.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-08 11:10 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Nice one! 😂

My doctor told me recently that the flu shot may prevent Alzheimer’s.

I smiled and nodded. Said I’d think about it. Did not say WHAT I would think about it. You can probably guess, though…

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-10 02:01 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
You get the feeling they're constantly hunting for the right words to say to people to get the outcome they desire. Zero respect, zero ethics, just what lie can we tell that will be effective today?

You know what? Doctors are quacks - don't trust them.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-13 01:36 pm (UTC)
charlieobert: (Default)
From: [personal profile] charlieobert
Actually I think the serious IQ test for those who took the vaxx is afterwards, and the test is how they deal with all the information on vaxx injuries and the deception around it.

Some people took the vaxx in good faith, not knowing any better. Now enough data is available if they choose to look. For those who were injured, or for their family, are they willing to admit they made a mistake and have to deal with its consequences? There's your test.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-09 02:36 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I feel stupider for having read that.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-08 03:40 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Every day young people die suddenly. My oncologist says that he sees young boys and girls having pancreatic cancer, something unheard of a few years ago. The majority of doctors are silent. There is a silent genocide going on that many ppl are unaware of.

Definition of Genocide

Date: 2025-04-08 05:57 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
It's curious how the definition went from

the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group [Merriam Webster Dictionary]

to the following:

the crime of intentionally destroying part or all of a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group, by killing people or by other methods: [Cambridge Dictionary]

I have always understood it to mean the complete lethal elimination of a targeted group. When did it become such a vague definition that it can be partial or not even involve death at all?

Caldathras

Re: Definition of Genocide

Date: 2025-04-08 10:54 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Note also that the second definition specifies that it is "the *crime* of", which to me implies "no conviction, no genocide". Of course, being half-Armenian, I come at this with generational hostility anyway...

Re: Definition of Genocide

Date: 2025-04-09 03:01 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Not at all -- homicide is the crime of murder or manslaughter. Even if the perpetrator manages to dodge prosecution, the crime was still committed.

Re: Definition of Genocide

Date: 2025-04-09 03:00 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
It wouldn't make sense to say that the Holocaust wasn't genocidal because Hitler didn't succeed in finishing off every single Jew. That way, "genocide" could apply only retrospectively to people from the distant past, the Midianites or the Albigensians, say. Nobody could protest genocide before it was completed because if there was a single target left standing to complain, it wasn't genocide.

As for "not involving death", think cultural genocide, as in Indian boarding schools, or the practice in China of sending Uighur men to slave labor camps and sending male Han agents to live in their houses and sleep in their beds. If the Uighur women aren't killed, but are forced to bear babies who aren't Uighur and aren't allowed to learn Uighur culture, in a couple of generations the Uighurs could effectively be gone without any mass graves.

Re: Definition of Genocide

Date: 2025-04-09 05:27 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
It wouldn't make sense to say that the Holocaust wasn't genocidal because Hitler didn't succeed in finishing off every single Jew.

But that's all in how you look at it. True, Hitler failed to murder them all but he is guilty of the crime of trying to commit genocide. Whereas, Cortés and his fellow conquistadors succeeded in wiping out the Aztec people and much of their culture (although, a South American friend of mine tells me that there are still individuals with Aztec blood alive today, so that attempt at genocide failed too). Complete genocide would be very difficult to accomplish. In my mind, the crime is in the intent and the attempt, not just in the success.

The rest of your post is very thought-provoking. Thank you for that.

Caldathras

Re: Definition of Genocide

Date: 2025-04-09 10:11 pm (UTC)
open_space: (Default)
From: [personal profile] open_space
Thank you! Millions is the right power of ten, even though some of us don't look nahuatl enough to satisfy the puritans and tourists. I was actually arranging my tlalmanalli (aztec altar) while I read this and was dumbfounded, given that last weekend I was at a temazcal with fellow participants singing songs from way back in Nahuatl, which is an official language right next to Spanish and other 67 indigenous languages like Zapotec, Totonac, Mazahua, Otomi, Yucatec, etc... It's notable to remember that the strength of the culture and people is so much, that the Catholic Church had to start incorporating the local culture into Mass to bring people in, spawning a great syncretism.

¡Chicahua! (That means, strength, btw). We are not going anywhere, anytime soon.

Here are a couple pics of the inside of the Anahucalli I took last week, a modern Nahua temple created by Diego Rivera dedicated to the four elements, with Our Lady Tonantzin of the Serpent Skirt towering in the ceiling.
Edited (inappropriate typo) Date: 2025-04-09 10:27 pm (UTC)

Re: Definition of Genocide

Date: 2025-04-10 03:29 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I certainly meant no offence and I apologize for my limited understanding of the history of your people and the confusion my previous comment caused. Graeber's interpretation made it sound like the wholesale slaughter of an entire people and culture. I am thrilled to know that this was not the case and that the Nahuatl continue to thrive. Thank you very much for all the background information.

Valuable lesson learned here. I should have known better than to rely on just one source. Once again, my apologies.

Caldathras

Re: Definition of Genocide

Date: 2025-04-10 07:29 am (UTC)
open_space: (Default)
From: [personal profile] open_space

Oh, none was taken whatsoever! I do not get offended at all by people not knowing something they haven't encountered, much less from the far lands down south. That only happens in bad schooling and to bruised egos. I just like to take any opportunity to talk a lot :-). Even many mexicans are unaware the Great Spirit is pretty much alive.

All is good and take care!

Re: Definition of Genocide

Date: 2025-04-12 02:49 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
A great syncretism indeed! When I have had the opportunity to interact with great mother Tonantzin Our Lady of Guadalupe, she has come across as being fully Aztec, with only a later veneer of Marian worship to camouflage her true nature. Likewise, my interactions with San Pasqualito Muerte, a potentially vicious ally to work with in the unseen realms; fortunately, he can also be quite generous when the whim strikes him. Thus far, I have not interacted directly with Santa Muerte, so haven't had the chance to ask her if she is actually Mictecacihuatl or some other divinity from her and Mictlantecuhtli's realm. One day, I will surely get that chance, but I do hope that won't be too terribly soon! So many things left to do this time round, including visiting that magical temple by Rivera.

— Christophe

Re: Definition of Genocide

Date: 2025-04-10 12:31 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I was being perhaps too succinct and, I'll admit, my knowledge does not seem to be as in-depth as yours. I've been told that much of the "official" history is Western propaganda. I don't know if that's true. Much of what I read about the matter came from David Graeber's Debt. He described Cortés as a greedy madman who was deeply in debt to Mediterranean bankers. Graeber said he worked his Aztec slaves to death. He cited the memoirs of a man who worked under Cortés, whose name escapes me at the moment. I was horrified by what I read. I am aware of Aztec descendants because friends from South America told me of them.

Caldathras

Re: Definition of Genocide

Date: 2025-04-10 03:42 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Yea, I sensed that while reading the book. His work was thought-provoking but one could also see he had certain biases.

Caldathras

Re: Definition of Genocide

Date: 2025-04-10 03:09 pm (UTC)
scotlyn: balancing posture in sword form (Default)
From: [personal profile] scotlyn
I'm not entirely sure this is a comprehensive reading of what Graeber wrote about La Conquista. (also, I would have to re-read the section to determine whether he characterised what he wrote about as genocide).

What I personally appreciated learning from that section of his Debt book (which I had not learned from any other historical source I had encountered up to that time) was the extent to which the actions of bankers enforcing claims upon their debtors *in Europe* radiated out to the effects - some of them quite ruinous - experienced by people as far away from Europe as Mexico.

Re: Definition of Genocide

Date: 2025-04-11 05:00 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
It's entirely possible that the label of genocide was from my personal interpretation of the events Graeber described in his book. Cortés was ruthless and brutal, though.

I concur with your second paragraph. I too found it very eye opening.

Caldathras

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-08 07:27 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
They say that the Chinese have lost 400m people since the Cooties. Not a word about it in anything approaching ofishul media.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-08 09:43 pm (UTC)
charlieobert: (Default)
From: [personal profile] charlieobert
Who is this "They" you refer to?

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-09 02:26 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I posted a few days ago about these videos from China where people are wondering why the streets and markets in both the cities and villages are so quiet. There are claims of unexplained increases in respiratory and other illnesses resulting in many deaths. I noted that, so often, information coming out of China has to be vetted but I am seeing an alarming rise in the number of such videos and that many of the Chinese interviewed suspect their version of the vaxx to be the reason for this increase in illness and death.

In my last post, I was wondering if anyone had any information about this phenomenon because what started out as videos complaining about slow sales after the Chinese New Year in February have morphed into these troubling reports of illness and depopulation.

Is the Chinese Communist Party attempting to hide something sinister or is this just propaganda?

Liam in Toronto

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-10 07:55 am (UTC)
the_arcane_archivist: (Default)
From: [personal profile] the_arcane_archivist
I'm not saying it's PsyOps but have you noticed that these comes under republican Trump terms, last time they came after the Huawei band, now after the tariffs. I'm not pretending that I know what happens in China, but I know for a fact that Western Media grossly missrepresent Asia and West Asia...

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-13 08:03 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] stubborn_ass
FWIW, you have been snared in the algo's web. While USAID has been defunded, the anti-china efforts continue unabated... there's seriously a ton of posters on YT who keep up negative stories on china day after day after day. You just check their previous years posts and the picture is pretty clear. Zero balance, just pretty much outright lies with often decent production values (big clue).

Yes China has problems. Russia has problems. Name one country which doesn't have problems. The question is scale and degree... the LEI's report has been mentioned here a couple of times about the big drop in China's population - so far it has zero credibility. There's a ton of vex injury stories on the Xiaohongshu app, so people have a sense that health has been greatly impacted, even by the non-mRNA covid shots.

FWIW, the best esoteric prognosticators that I track over the past few years, are mostly in agreement that the dieoff becomes obvious this year in most countries, while continueing to pick up speed in 2026 and even more 2027. At which point governments will have zero credibility. That is one big reason why the drumbeat for war is so loud, especially in Europe.... and US (focusing on different theaters). They really need a big distraction from what is happening, but thankfully most of the forecasters are saying that the war efforts will be for naught. The ongoing war propaganda isn't gaining the traction that they need (thanks to innoculation from the covid bullshale), and without enough public support, they can't even get enough soldiers to sign up, let alone keep a crumbling industrial base to build the weapons.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-09 02:40 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
And I might pose the question as to why so many initial cancer diagnosis are stage 4? (I don't need an answer)

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-10 01:22 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Not that you want this anyway, but…

Historically, many cancers only announce themselves in the latter stages; by the time you become aware of them the question is "When will you die," not "How can we get rid of it." Lung Cancer was well known for being this type of Cancer, same for other forms of cancer that hit up other organs – and there are forms of Skin Cancer that start at Level 4 even in plain sight.

Not to say your thoughts about what's going on now are wrong (given what was snuck in the shot), but Cancer = Death has a deep history in our culture – deep enough to allow for a fifty-year "War™️" on various forms of Cancer to have existed.

– Donald Hargraves

This hits home.

Date: 2025-04-08 03:45 pm (UTC)
michele7: (Default)
From: [personal profile] michele7
My dad has been diagnosed with blood cancer. Now, granted he is 89 and has been in heart failure for years. Of course, he is totally up to date on the Covid shots, because he listens to his doctors. ahem. I'm not saying this has anything to do with the blood cancer, but... His doctor gives him a couple of months max.

Re: This hits home.

Date: 2025-04-08 06:04 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
One of my close relative got leukemia too. She is in her 60s. I recommended IVM and Fenbendazole, but that suggestion was promptly ignored.

Re: This hits home.

Date: 2025-04-08 08:42 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Getting such a diagnosis is scary as heck. I've been there.

That said, I am now aware of ivermectin and fenben, and that's what I would suggest looking into, too.

My faith in oncologists faded along with my faith in the medical profession that pushed the covid jabs.

Re: This hits home.

Date: 2025-04-08 06:06 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
or to be clear, I sent a bunch of academic papers showing success in using those two chemicals. I am not a doctor, and doctors are told by FDA to not look at these "banned" chemicals.

Re: This hits home.

Date: 2025-04-08 08:43 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
michele7, may your dad can be as well and as comfortable as possible.

Re: This hits home.

Date: 2025-04-09 12:56 pm (UTC)
michele7: (Default)
From: [personal profile] michele7
Thank you for your kind thoughts.

Re: This hits home.

Date: 2025-04-09 02:44 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
My cousin died last month. He was 74 but had been in excellent health. He had had a growth on his belly. It did not seem to have spread but his doctors decided it should be removed. He had the surgery but the bleeding did not stop. It was determined that he had developed some sort of auto-immune disorder that prevented clotting - basically like a form of hemophilia. He bled to death.

On Sunday, I bumped into my neighbor across the hall. He and his wife have lived mostly at their country house since the onset of COVID. However, I often saw her as she came into the city for shopping etc. I saw her last a few weeks ago, we exchanged pleasantries and she looked fine. He told me that she died about a week or so after I saw her of "turbo cancer" (his words). He told me it literally took a week from the time she felt unwell until her death. He then confessed to me that she blamed everything on the jabs she had had to get for her work. He asked me what I thought of that and I told him.

This all came as a great surprise because his wife had been very critical of me not being vaxxed and especially of me convincing my kid not to be vaxxed. I was quite taken aback by her apparent change of heart, needless to say.

Liam in Toronto

Re: This hits home.

Date: 2025-04-09 10:53 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Oh, Liam, what a terrible thing to have happened. May your neighbor rest in peace.

SDPM

Re: This hits home.

Date: 2025-04-09 10:59 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Liam, I read your post, I don't have brain fog, but I was so shocked by it that I neglected to also offer condolences for your cousin! Equally shocking! May he also rest in peace.

SDPM

Re: This hits home.

Date: 2025-04-10 06:43 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Thanks for your kind words. Yes, it is shocking. I know that auto-immune issues can manifest in many forms but I've never heard of this before. When his brother told me, I had to ask him to qualify it to be sure that I understood properly. It was gruesome because, like hemophilia often is, it was horribly painful so they put him into an induced coma. They brought him out of it when they realized that there was nothing further they could do for him so he could say good-bye to his family. Mercifully, he died a day or so later. This branch of my family are true believers and went all-in on the jabs so I did not make any further inquiries.

Liam in Toronto

Re: This hits home.

Date: 2025-04-10 03:25 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Condolences for your cousin Liam.

"This all came as a great surprise because his wife had been very critical of me not being vaxxed and especially of me convincing my kid not to be vaxxed. I was quite taken aback by her apparent change of heart, needless to say."

And it is quite possible that your stand on vaxx influenced her. Many people fell for the first round of intense gaslighting but then the repeated boosters (of gaslighting) started to have the opposite effect, especially when they saw the completely unvaxxed not dropping dead.

Re: This hits home.

Date: 2025-04-10 06:55 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Thank you.

My neighbor was nice but she had VERY definite opinions - as do I! LOL!! We agreed to disagree and never spoke of it again but I'm sure the shock of her diagnosis (understandably) got her thinking. Her husband told me she was adamant that it was the jabs. She had taken the standard two shots plus the booster - as did he because of his job. I tried to be "diplomatically" honest when he asked me for my opinion. He just nodded his head and then told me that he wished he had never done it. What else can be said?

Liam in Toronto

Re: This hits home.

Date: 2025-04-13 08:38 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] stubborn_ass
I Just heard a couple days ago from a friend who saw a social media post by another friend... someone they knew, only in his 30's, healthy and fit gymgoer, got diagnosed with stomach cancer and was gone in 2 weeks. At the same time, their domestic helper, has also been diagnosed with the same condition. Looks like the whole family and the help went for their shots together.....

I actually have a lot of thoughts based on the vex-injured folks I'm interacting with. Simply put, the folks who reached out later, have developed more issues that we need to deal with, and it's much harder to resolve them as the damage has kept accumulating over time. A big problem is that we can't even do proper detox, as most have developed some degree of kidney failure. Last weekm I've discussed some of the kidney failure numbers I managed to dig up for SG via news articles... just before 2020, we had 2 new kidney failures daily. That became 4 by 2022, and 6 by 2024. That is the number for total kidney failure requiring dialysis. Lots more folks are now in various stages of kidney failure with much reduced kidney function. They can't take the normal dose of natto/serra, VIM etc, without quick swelling of their legs and feet (aka sign of kidney unable to clear waste products). So I've asked them to dial back the dosage to really just bare minimum, and it's still helping them, as we can still see slow improvement in their blood pressure and blood sugar numbers, but the progress is much slower and has to be managed more delicately.

Scotlyn (or any others) - would like to have your input.. is there a TCM procedure to help improve liver/kidney function? For the unvexed, we'll normally take milk thistle and it helps the kidney to work better and handle the daily detox load from the shedding. But for the vexed folks who only approached in the last few months, I have a sinking feeling that all the protocols we developed won't work unless it's done in conjunction with those folks doing dialysis, even if they don't have full kidney failure yet. Just a bit too much detox, and there's an incrased chance of them developing some auto-immunity issues, kinda like losing weight too quickly and releasing stored toxins into circulation. Generally speaking, the folks who approached me before the end of last year were still able to progress well with the detox program... for the folks who only came to me this year, most get swollen feet pretty fast, which clued me into the whole kidney issue. A small sidenote - low dose daily VIM seems to have the least kidney impact so far, people generally feel much better but not everyone has managed to secure access to VIM, and I am not putting myself into a position of vulnerability by supplying them in case the system takes more notice.

Re: This hits home.

Date: 2025-04-13 02:57 pm (UTC)
scotlyn: balancing posture in sword form (Default)
From: [personal profile] scotlyn
“Scotlyn (or any others) - would like to have your input.. is there a TCM procedure to help improve liver/kidney function? For the unvexed, we'll normally take milk thistle and it helps the kidney to work better and handle the daily detox load from the shedding. But for the vexed folks who only approached in the last few months, I have a sinking feeling that all the protocols we developed won't work unless it's done in conjunction with those folks doing dialysis, even if they don't have full kidney failure yet. Just a bit too much detox, and there's an incrased chance of them developing some auto-immunity issues, kinda like losing weight too quickly and releasing stored toxins into circulation.”

Gosh, this is the hardest question to answer in general terms (as opposed to when consulting individually with someone you can see and talk to). So I will throw out some general thoughts, in no particular order, and you will decide if anything speaks to you.

The first point I would raise is the one you have already noticed. In any person with a pathogenic load, the level of the load needs to be assessed, but so ALSO does the strength of the person's UPRIGHT QI. When a person's upright qi is not strong, the pathogenic load does not have to be large to cause damage. And in the cases you are talking about, the pathogenic load IS likely quite large, and has already had time to weaken the upright qi. So, the aim of any treatment has to include efforts to preserve/enhance the patient's upright qi at the same time as trying to reduce their pathogenic load in a way that does not further harm their upright qi. (You are doing already doing the second by making sure the detox effort is done more slowly and gently). So, my biggest suggestion is to look for any way to actively nourish/defend/preserve the person's upright qi. (Many of the common suggestions made here for nourishing the etheric body are applicable, and also anything that is emotionally calming, fear-reducing, and nourishing to the spirit).

Secondly, I'd say that with oedema there are a few things that might be going on there. In western medicine lower limb swelling may relate to heart function as well as to kidney function. But also, do not forget the micro-structures – capillary permeability throughout the vascular and lymph systems may be involved, with or without changes to heart or kidneys. Also consider whether it is possible to buffer changes in the fluid electrolyte balance, as they are affected by whatever is detoxing. I have heard of some people using activated charcoal in order to absorb toxins in their transit between liver and gut, to make sure they continue on out of the body and do not “wash back” into the liver. Apparently timing is critical, but I have not practiced this myself, so it would need to be looked intoin more detail.

In TCM terms lower limb swelling is a function of Spleen as well as of Kidney, and if there is pitting oedema, then you are probably talking about Spleen and/or Kidney Yang deficiency. Try building yang qi (possibly including moxa treatments). The other thing to consider (which I have been working at in my clinic since early in the Covid pandemic) are all of the ways to treat blood stasis (ie- microclotting, and all clotting or bleeding disorders). Fluids and blood and qi must harmonise for the body to perform all of its maintenance functions. In acupuncture we sometimes make use of the three-corner needle to treat blood stasis. I'll let you look that up. Both moxa, and three-corner needle treatments can be effectively applied at the jing-well points under the nail beds of fingers and toes - this is where yin qi and yang qi meet one another and begin to build strength.

Finally, perhaps a local TCM herbalist might suggest herbs that can rescue a person's upright qi, and mobilise their yang qi so that they can more effectively detox their pathogenic loads.

Whatever of use any of this might be to you, please also have my blessing, for all of the work you do.

Re: This hits home.

Date: 2025-04-14 12:23 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] stubborn_ass
Ah thank you very much... the 'upright qi' framework was what I needed to put things in proper context.

I tend to do things on a studied 'intuitive' basis... not guesswork as many things would just feel 'wrong' to me, aiding me in avoiding deadends. Sometimes the inspiration may come after a few hours of readings, sometimes after a few days, plus lots of subconscious work. Then when a promising path appears, fate is kind enough to often provide snippets of info confirming my intuition, or a random person would post on the same subject out of nowhere and I would end up being in touch with the person so suss out what they've done with a certain protocol over time and their experiences. Following that, there would often be testing with immediate family members first, figuring that our genetic profiles would be most similar to each other, and everyone having a slightly different protocol to see what works best. I'm pretty much the initial guinea pig, to make sure stuff is safe first.

Fate has also seen fit to keep me humble and emphathic. When I had my turbo lung cancer towards the end of last year from shedding, I was pretty nonchalent as I knew I had stuff which worked well against it. I took extended breaks from treatment as it would make me more tired than usual as I needed to be up and about for family reasons. That gave the cancer more time to grow and by the time I decided to treat it aggressively, the fallout was significant. Going really high dose vim created a huge pathogenic load that overwhelmed my lymph nodes. Pretty debilitating pain, which forced me to test a combination of strong painkillers and taking a treatment break every 4th day to keep me at a functional level, instead of being bedridden with pain. That served to remind me that even stage 4 cancer patients should not be getting the very high doses being touted by various doctors now treating cancer with VIM. My gut feel is that such patients would still get excellent results at 1/4 of the suggested high dose (2mg/kg) if it's in liquid VIM form, and they might recover faster overall. Anyways, the whole episode served to remind me that most patients would feel very alone and scared as their bodies seem to go haywire, even as they're seeing a highly credentialed doctor. That reinforces the basic principle which I try to drum into the vex-injured folks I'm advising... slow and steady wins the race. Too fast, and you're more likely to trip and injure yourself further.

Anyways... back to the 'upright qi'. Niacin aka Vit B3 (flush version) is one of the key ingredients that I'm using to top up people's energy and also immune system. Quick recap, Vit B1 and B3 are the main energy carriers/enablers in our bodies, but we also need trace amounts of the other B (6/9/12 etc), which can get depleted over time if we mainly focus on taking high doses of B1 and B3. With acupuncture, I've used that to direct 'qi' towards a more specific injury area, thus speeding up the healing of said area tremendously. Taking niacin - is like juicing up the body's energy system in general, and so far it works well for most people in terms of the body knowing which areas need the more urgent repairs done, so the niacin gets directed towards that. We can't see the healing if it's mostly internal, but it's happening.

I've spoken to people who have been on high dose niacin (3000mg) daily for at least 6 months... they were initially in really bad state, and thus all that extra energy has been beneficial for them. A point of clarification - the B vitamins are not energy per se, you still have to get your nutrients and energy from food for the most part, the B complex just enables more efficient and higher throughput usage of that energy.

So I have enough anec-data for 3000mg, and 1 particular vex injured person who has a whole host of issues has been doing that for almost 2 months now and the severity and instances of those symptoms have lessened over time. We're trusting that his body knows best where to direct that 'qi' for healing.

Another point of reference is that when one is pushing that much energy through the body using niacin, if it's not used up or deem necessary by the body, the fasting blood sugar numbers tend to rise after a few days - that's our experience. If it goes up 3 to 4 days in a row and hitting the high range of normal, dropping the niacin level back to 500-1000mg for a day or two resets it to baseline. Aka no long-term damage done as long as we monitor.

In very recent months, my 2 youngest kids who are still in school started to exhibit signs of shedding damage in their own physical ways. Another big clue was that their fasting blood sugar numbers started to drop down towards the low end of normal, numbers which we almost never see with them. So the youngest kid, who was on 1000mg daily has been boosted to 3000mg daily. His blood sugar is now back in his previous normal range after almost 1 month... and when it goes high enough, we'll dial back the dosage accordingly.

The other kid was on 2000-3000mg daily based on the level of anticipated activity for the day, high level athlete. She is now on 4000mg - the highest we have ever used. It took about a couple of weeks before her minor injuries started to heal properly again. I had to think carefully for a couple of days before deciding to go that high for her as most firm literature on high niacin doses have been buried deep. Basically despite them using a number of anti-shedding protocols, the shedding load has become so high that their immune system is now being actively engaged directly on a daily basis, so much so that it was getting drawn down significantly.

For extra reference, both kids have also been taught to do the SOP daily....



Re: This hits home.

Date: 2025-04-14 03:23 pm (UTC)
scotlyn: balancing posture in sword form (Default)
From: [personal profile] scotlyn
Well, again, best wishes with all you are doing - as you follow your heart's call, and apply your intuitive mind to the problems. :)

I have introduced 3 or 4 of my patients to the concept of the SOP (with links to the relevant posts here). I never know what people WILL do with information they receive, but I was delighted when one of those people told me they had begun to do the practice everyday... and found it very emotionally steadying. :)

I do think that fear is highly injurious, highly contagious, and easily "shed" by its carriers - it may be the number one thing that we all could use more protection from.

Re: This hits home.

Date: 2025-04-13 03:09 pm (UTC)
scotlyn: balancing posture in sword form (Default)
From: [personal profile] scotlyn
PS, to the above I would add this... if the ultimate goal is a person's health, it may be that going for dialysis turns out to be both necessary and unavoidable for some.

Of course, for some people the ultimate goal will be to avoid hospitals at all costs - and for those people
- the issue of dialysis will weigh up completely differently.

In both cases, you will do what you feel called to do in support. And, having done what is necessary, forget it (Dao De Jing, Passage No 2)... :)

Re: This hits home.

Date: 2025-04-12 11:00 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
hi michele

my dad was diagnosed with blood cancer two years ago. this was after he had 4 mrna jabs (didn’t want them but had to, to be able to gain access to the hospital to receive treatment for a separate non-cancer issue).

they gave him 6 months max to live. i got him on menbendazale and ivermectin. he was getting blood transfusions every week and now he rarely has them.

jez

Re: This hits home.

Date: 2025-04-13 02:27 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] stubborn_ass
Thank you for this invaluable data point. Mebendazole has been on my good-to-acquire list for quite a while, but for whatever reason, a prescription is needed hereabouts. I have had enough hints from various reports that it has very effective action modes against certain cancers. The backstory is that while it's an old drug, the generic maker took it off the market for a few years and then reintroduced it at 80x the original price. So among the various dewormers that we can use, it is by far the priciest.

The indications are that the mode of action is closest to fenben, but not exactly. While I think the worries about neurological issues from long-term usage of fenben is overstated (on purpose), the real issue as other folks have stated - is that fenben does taste like paint.

Re: This hits home.

Date: 2025-04-13 02:27 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I think the "-bendazoles" are all fairly similar chemically

Not sure if this info is accurate, but I have seen an online exchange between a layperson and a doctor where the doctor implied that menben was more easily absorbed by the body than fenben. Also on my radar is a paper describing administration of DMSO and fenben, to improve the amount actually reaching the bloodstream.

*Ochre Harebrained Curmudgeon*

New Idaho Law

Date: 2025-04-08 04:06 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
https://substack.com/redirect/ed1c6d01-6fd9-4882-9160-5031ea5930b0?j=eyJ1IjoiNng1ZXIifQ.1OXrsV0ADetFmyY3Pj7t5pdnsoijJd4Fo1MR8inIEyU

For any who missed it, Idaho passed a law that will make officialdom overreach much more difficult in the event of another “medical emergency.”

Re: New Idaho Law

Date: 2025-04-08 04:54 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Yay! And there is a bill awaiting the Governor's decision to make Ivermectin available over the counter here in Idaho:
https://legislature.idaho.gov/sessioninfo/2025/legislation/S1211/

May it be so....

Re: New Idaho Law

Date: 2025-04-08 06:23 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
It kind of makes Idaho look like it might be a nice place to live. We'll certainly never see anything like that up here in Canada. The declaration of a public health emergency under the Public Health Act would just allow the health authorities to override and ignore it anyway.

😡

Caldathras

Covid files all in one place

Date: 2025-04-08 04:40 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] team10tim
I don't know if this has been posted before, but the people who came together to oppose the covid madness have put together a repository for all things covid:

https://c19files.org/

Designed to host FOIAs, legislation, peer reviewed papers, lawsuits, etc. I'm unclear how far along the project is from the website, it's searchable but not indexed. So, I don't know how much material they currently have. But if you're interested in contributing to this project, they are looking for volunteers.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-08 04:57 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Week 192

Thank you, dear JMG, and dear forumistas.

This week, an important moment for me professionally; I opted to move forward with a long-delayed project. I had been extremely reluctant to interact with my colleagues after their Jab Crow circa 2021-2022. There are still many colleagues whom I prefer to avoid, and I don't think that is going to change. However, like a bear after winter, I'm coming out my cave, as it were. I've been celebrating the recent medical freedom legislation in Idaho. And taking a lot of sunshine.

Cetiosaurus

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-08 10:48 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Great news!

W.R.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-08 11:17 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
May all go well for you, Cetiosaurus!

It’s always a pleasure to read your weekly message. 🙏

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-08 06:09 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
COVID-19 rules barring protests in 2021 were unconstitutional: Ontario’s top court

https://www.ctvnews.ca/windsor/article/covid-19-rules-barring-protests-in-2021-were-unconstitutional-ontarios-top-court/

ive seen some ppl say that ctv picked that pic to make him look bad, having a smoke.
lol


(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-08 11:11 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
lol, Canada has no constitution.

Or more specifically, Canada does not have US style "bill of rights" in its so-called constitution. Canadian bill of rights of 1960 was just a federal statute. The "Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms" marketed as US style bill of rights did not get approved by Quebec. Moreover, the "notwithstanding clause" means governments can suspend those "rights" whenever WEF tells them to do so.



(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-08 11:15 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_33_of_the_Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms

" The notwithstanding clause authorizes governments to temporarily override the rights and freedoms in sections 2 and 7 through 15 for up to five years, subject to renewal."

Section 2 -

"2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:

(a) freedom of conscience and religion;

(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;

(c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and

(d) freedom of association."

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-09 05:53 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Other rights such as section 6 mobility rights, democratic rights, and language rights are inviolable.

A simple majority vote in any of Canada's 14 jurisdictions may suspend the core rights of the Charter. Similarly, a majority vote in that same jurisdiction can override that previous suspension.

The clause was proposed by Peter Lougheed, premier of Alberta, and reluctantly put in by the federal government.

Finally, Quebec has its own Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms, put in place in 1976. Perhaps, they felt it was superior to the federal one?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec_Charter_of_Human_Rights_and_Freedoms

Caldathras

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-08 06:12 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Exclusive: Senior CIA Official Who Facilitated Biden’s Military COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Fired

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/04/08/exclusive-senior-cia-official-who-facilitated-bidens-military-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-fired/

quite a few hold-overs are still there..

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-08 08:48 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Wow, the comments there!!

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-10 02:16 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Now if we could start seeing some arrests...

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-08 08:39 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] anonymoose_canadian
Quite a few people involved with internet culture I've been tracking have commented over the past few months about just how easy it has become to automate spam. A number of forums I used to frequent have either shutdown or given up on moderation. At this point I think it's only a matter of time, and probably not a very long time either, before the open internet becomes impossible to use for any kind of discussions.

Do you have a plan for if the AI powered spam makes these kinds of open forums unmanageable?

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-08 10:28 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Is it Substack?

J.L.Mc12

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-09 02:55 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] anonymoose_canadian
I am extremely happy to hear it is not substack. I read their user agreement and want nothing to do with them having seen how bad their agreement is. Despite rhetoric and a business model slightly friendlier to content creators, they are at least as bad as most other tech companies in most ways, and worse than average in others.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-08 10:53 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
JMG,
Thank you for your commitment to maintaining this space. I really appreciate it.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-08 11:35 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Good to hear! Other forums I like to read for the lively comments have been going through paroxysms of hostile anons cluttering up the combox and making it impossible to hold anything like a conversation.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-09 02:57 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] anonymoose_canadian
I for one strongly appreciate this. Even on those occasions where one of my posts has been deleted, it is usually, on reflection, for the best.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-09 11:01 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I can say the same

SDPM

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-09 05:52 am (UTC)
vitranc: (Default)
From: [personal profile] vitranc
I would like to join the thanks for maintaining the wonderful discussion space. Thank you.

On a more upbeat side, knowing your capacity for growing or regrowing orders and lodges. Down the road there might even be a prospect for a lodge system for commenters. 🙂
Just imagine using a grade: “apprentice ordained JMG commenter” 🥸

Best regards,
V

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-09 12:23 pm (UTC)
vitranc: (Default)
From: [personal profile] vitranc
😢 Right now. I’d like that a lot.
I’m really looking forward to Glastonbury. 🙂

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-10 07:10 pm (UTC)
scotlyn: balancing posture in sword form (Default)
From: [personal profile] scotlyn
Please, vitranc (and anyone else who might be at Glastonbury in June), it would be great if you would take a minute to go across to this post and introduce yourself to others planning to be there, too. :)

Ostensibly it is about making arrangements to travel there, and so on, but it also seems to give us scope to discuss the event, and our plans, among ourselves, before we get there...

https://glastonburyarrangements.dreamwidth.org/352.html

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-09 07:50 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I understand your reasons for this possible change but I, for one, would miss the ability to make anonymous posts. I prefer that as little if my personal information be out there on the Internet as possible, so being able to operate without having to register and/or login in suits me. With login accounts, I also have to utilize the browser's private mode, as I do not trust the cookies being left behind. This costs me more in download data, as none of the web assets are stored offline.

Still, you gotta do what you gotta do and I will just have to adapt.

Caldathras

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-11 04:09 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Until you call us anonymous pests, I refuse to get a named account :)

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-11 03:17 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
That's good news. I still cling to the hope that some shred of online privacy is still possible. I've been able to be more frank here than elsewhere thanks to the pseudonymous anonymity.

*Ochre Harebrained Curmudgeon*

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-09 02:43 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
The other day someone was laying it out just how bad this could become. A flood of posts that are automated via AI slop to keep people constantly on the the defense, or as you said, to simply overwhelm the moderation teams until they give up. A single desktop computer can now generate this stuff non-stop 24 hours a day, complete with fake citations it generates itself. When that gets weaponized into a business that can multiply that by thousands, it is going to be rough.

And yet again, we are cleaning up after those that were to interested in seeing if they could do something rather than question if they should.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-09 03:04 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I can't even imagine what it means to be a teacher at any level these days with AI available to students....

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-10 03:41 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Same tools are available to the teacher as well. I suspect that teaching will have to change to use more of the Socratic Method, but who knows?

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-10 08:11 pm (UTC)
adara9: (Default)
From: [personal profile] adara9
My son's in high school, and one of his teachers assigned an essay to be prepared at home, but actually written in class. I've also heard about folks requiring handwritten papers instead of typed / computer. Finally, some teachers are moving towards more oral examinations / recitations. (Everything old is new again.)

And then there are the AI tools to detect plagiarism &/or AI-written papers.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-11 12:46 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] anonymoose_canadian
I would be very, very careful with AI tools meant to detect AI. AI can glitch out in some pretty wild ways, and worse, can be hacked. There's an entire field, adversarial attacks, devoted to using AI to find ways to fool other AI systems. Since the way that generative AI works is that it uses two systems, the disriminator that tries to identify what things are, and the generative system that tries to make things that fool the discriminator, generative AI is already part way there.

Even worse, assuming the claims made in Not with a Bug but with a Sticker are accurate, many of these exploitable glitches are features of most if not all AI systems that are designed to do similar tasks, so once found, they will fool everything that is not specifically trained not to fall for that specific trick. Add to this that I haven't seen any conclusive reason why what YouTube's enegineers called "The Inversion", the moment where AI systems, facing a flood of fake material being designed intentionally to fool them, start to conclude that the human activity is fake, and I've come to think that there's a very real risk that the use of AI tools to detect AI will backfire spectacularly because it will eventually start to determine most human activities are actually AI.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-11 06:09 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
It's just that old IT chestnut, "Garbage in, garbage out."

(But the cost in money and expended energy is many orders of magnitude higher than anything earlier.)

*Ochre Harebrained Curmudgeon*

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-09 07:32 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I was about to submit my investigative report on the members of a Masonic lodge conspiring to plot the next pandemic under the leadership of an archdruid. I guess that post will not go through :)

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-10 10:33 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] deathcap
Goodness, this checks out. We have an annual debate over which version of the GA flag we're supposed to use. The history behind the past hundred years of changes to the state flag is contentious, to say the least, and so the end result is basically no change, and we're using the one from the back half of the 20th. The neighboring lodge south of us also has this, but they're using the version that was effective for a couple years in the early 2000s.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-09 08:11 am (UTC)
the_arcane_archivist: (Default)
From: [personal profile] the_arcane_archivist
I apologise I made one of that offtopic/"they"-quasy-deliberate post.

I put that post on my DW blog. I don't believe in a deliberate plot, but I think there is a will coming from the PMC class or the egregore, maybe from the wrong computer and mathematical model or science or mindset at least at the bureaucratic level much like how the Vogon popped the Earth(of the The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy fame). Maybe they have the math at the time but usually mathematical models may reflect bias from the author too, so is chicken and egg.
Edited Date: 2025-04-09 12:05 pm (UTC)

SARS-COV-2 origins

Date: 2025-04-08 06:36 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
This is a summary of things I've posted in other websites in the last years.

Several clues of SARS-COV-2 point to an artificial origin:

1) SARS-CoV-2 arose in Wuhan, the location of a virus research institute.

2) The DEFUSE grant
*SARS-COV-2 has chimaeric structure, as described in DEFUSE
*SARS-COV-2 has Furin Cleavage Site(which no other known coronavirus has), as described in DEFUSE
*SARS-COV-2 has DC-SIGN transmission, as described in DEFUSE
*SARS-COV-2 has interferon dysregulation, as described in DEFUSE
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21066966-defuse-proposal
Project DEFUSE: Defusing the Threat of Bat-borne Coronaviruses
Peter Daszak Ecohealth Alliance
EcoHealth and Daszak have received money from USAID, but lets put that aside for the moment.

3) SARS-CoV-2 has a Furin Cleavage Site in its Spike protein
* The exact FCS of SARS-CoV-2 is not found in any other coronavirus and in fact it contains specific RNA sequences - CGG CGG - that are almost nonexistent in bats but are optimized for humans. Not only are FCS’s nonexistent in other SARS coronaviruses, but this specific FCS is particularly anomalous in its optimization for humans.
* The SARS-CoV-2 FCS has not one but two CGG codons appropriate for humans and it mimics a particular protein (ENaC) found in humans. (see https://elifesciences.org/articles/58603)

4) SARS-CoV-2 has the restriction map of an infectious clone: The BsaI/BsmBI Restriction Map
*The DEFUSE grant proposed to make chimeric coronaviruses with furin cleavage sites in their Spike protein. The easiest way to insert a Furin cleavage site and make chimeric coronaviruses would involve assembling a DNA clone. There is one extremely common way to assemble a DNA clone for a coronavirus, a method that was specifically cited in DEFUSE and other grants from this group of collaborators proposing to make chimeric coronaviruses in Wuhan.
*The specific method of assembly was published by none other than one of the collaborators on the DEFUSE grant in his seminal paper: “Efficient Reverse Genetic Systems for Rapid Genetic Manipulation of Emergent and Preemergent Infectious Coronaviruses”.

5) The CTCCTCGGCGGGCA sequence
The SARS-COV-2 Furin Cleavage Site contains a 19 nucleotides sequence patented by Moderna. The final codon completed inserted in the sequence CTCCTCGGCGGGCA, patented by Moderna, does not exist in natural viruses and neither does the CGG-coded Furin Cleavage Site CCTCGGCGGGCACGT. Its possible that the virus was made from the 19 nucleotide Moderna specific chimeric (CGG for AGA) FCS, which does not occur anywhere in nature as early as 2013.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US9587003B2/en
Bancel S, Chakraborty T, De Fougerolles A, Elbashir SM, John M, Roy A, et al. Modified Polynucleotides for the Production of Oncology-Related Proteins and Peptides. Cambridge, MA: United States Patent. (2016).
Modified polynucleotides for the production of oncology-related proteins and peptides
The invention relates to compositions and methods for the preparation, manufacture and therapeutic use of oncology-related polynucleotides, oncology-related primary transcripts and oncology-related mRNA molecules.

Re: SARS-COV-2 origins

Date: 2025-04-09 07:11 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
clues? as in (Inspector) Clouseau? or shall we just slap each other roundly with trout til the tears flow? i appreciate your post, anon, i truly do.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-08 08:27 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)


U.S. Navy Invites Former Sailors to Apply for Reentry under Executive Order 14184

https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/News-Stories/Article/4148912/us-navy-invites-former-sailors-to-apply-for-reentry-under-executive-order-14184/

some good news, though it says there will be no
back pay

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-08 10:44 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
The Navy’s generosity is so incredible!

Cugel

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-09 09:05 pm (UTC)
wolf_wobo: A Dog (Default)
From: [personal profile] wolf_wobo
that doesn't sound as if they made sound decisions regarding the vaccine policies.

I wonder how many "former" members of the "world's biggest canoe club" will take them up on their offer?

~Wolf :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-10 02:15 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Didn't they quietly remove all the vaccine requirements a few years ago when their recruitment numbers started to go into freefall? I remember people posting texts they got from Marine recruiters saying something like "all of that is gone now, come back, we need you". With a posted response telling the recruiter to go stick his head in a moist dark place.

I suspect the slogan "Go Fight and Die for Trump" probably is more persuasive than "Go Fight and Die for Joe Biden" or the really hilarious "Go Fight and Die for Kamala Harris" but I'd advise against it. You never do know who they're going to install as the next president and you could end up fighting and dying for a complete clown. Bait, and switch.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-10 09:56 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Sorry can not recall were I read this but the U S Navy has app 27 ships in dry dock reason no crews. In my part of the world several former navy sailors will never get back on a ship. Blueberry

One Nation Under Blackmail

Date: 2025-04-08 09:43 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Candace Owens says that RFK Jr is being blackmailed. That might explain his puzzling behaviour now he's Secretary of HHS. She says it at around 10 minutes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkpRKL4gNPA

I don't have much more than that.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-08 11:39 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Country star John Rich explains how he got Trump to stop bragging about Operation Warp Speed

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/country-star-john-rich-explains-how-he-got-trump-to-stop-bragging-about-operation-warp-speed/

that is very interesting..

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-09 01:12 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Indeed !

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-09 07:43 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Interesting, yes. Though I have to say I struggle to believe Trump would be so in the dark as that narrative makes it sound. It depends when this conversation was supposed to have happened.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-09 11:59 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
We, the American people, do not trust the people that you were forced to trust … the FDA, the CDC, the NIH, the WHO, Fauci and all the rest of them … we consider them to be a bunch of murderous de-populationist psychopaths.

Man, to have seen the president’s face when he heard that one… I’m a big supporter, but boy, I’m sure that was priceless. Truth hurts, literally and figuratively.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-09 09:00 pm (UTC)
wolf_wobo: A Dog (Default)
From: [personal profile] wolf_wobo
certainly :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-10 02:05 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I've heard people tell others to "go to h*ll" but this is the first time I've ever heard someone say "go to Reddit"

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-10 02:49 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
"Reddit is the archdruid hell" will be posted on the wall of our new Masonic lodge.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-10 03:45 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Probably to the people who frequent Reddit, to the rest of us - no difference.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-11 12:35 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] anonymoose_canadian
It would not surprise me if somewhere in one of the Circles of Hell there was a computer with Reddit access; and the unwary get trapped there for centuries having pointless arguments with strangers over whether or not the computer they are using is in the third or fourth Circle of Hell, when it is actually in the fifth....

Worsening symptoms and more

Date: 2025-04-09 11:32 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
People don't talk about it much anymore, but I'm seeing clusters of negative symptoms continue to worsen in multiple people. A big one is nerve pain. I know one person who recently lost his job and dropped out of contact after increasingly bad nerve problems left him largely unable to move his arms and hands. Someone else has become unable to make fists; he can only close his hands about enough to hold an egg. Another friend is becoming less and less able to use one arm due to shooting pain and numbness over the last year and a half.

I feel like there's some element of "Trump curse" to this as well. The latter friend has TDS to the point of making his home WiFi password "F___Trump" and many of the people I've known as the most pro-fox left-wing virtue signalers are meeting with one disaster after another. People who were doing great in their lives and careers a few years ago are now complete wrecks. Is anyone else seeing this?

Re: Worsening symptoms and more

Date: 2025-04-09 05:39 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
In answer to your question, is anyone else seeing this? I have commented here before a couple of times at how, when I go downtown on errands, I see a remarkable number of people who are having trouble walking. It's nothing like I saw in the past. Well, I was downtown again this morning. I was shocked; it was even worse than ever. I saw several people (didn't count, but at least 7) hobbling on crutches, several using with rollators (walkers), a lot of limping, and some shuffling. One man, honest to Gadzooks, he went down the sidewalk in agony, looking as if it was taking every ounce of his will to take one step at all. I can't know for sure, of course, but this looks to me like evidence of widespread neurological damage from the jabs.

I also saw a man in the food court behaving normally but making weird grimaces— that looked to me like a tic. Again, I'd guess that may be neurological damage from the jabs.

The pharmacy is offering all kinds of jabs on a "walk in" basis.

This morning I only saw one person wearing a mask. He looked on the young side of middle-aged and he was on crutches.

Re: Worsening symptoms and more

Date: 2025-04-09 11:12 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I also know someone who took the jabs who then, that same year, all of a sudden lost strength in his hands. And around 2022 I happened to be a gas station shop and overheard one old guy say to another, that all of a sudden he couldn't grasp things with his hands anymore.

Now I do not doubt that weakness in the hands has happened to many people on Planet Earth before the jabs, however, I am going into my 7th decade here and I never heard of that directly before, not once.

Re: Worsening symptoms and more

Date: 2025-04-10 03:25 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
The affected people I've known were in their 30s and 40s. I've never heard of such symptoms in that age cohort before.

Re: Worsening symptoms and more

Date: 2025-04-12 03:21 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Well now... do consider how many thirty year olds passed all of the covid-hysteria years in their parents' basements, inducing unmentionable manual stress disorders while watching porn. Or, for the more socially acceptable version, imagine how many younguns are suffering from carpal texting disorder in their grotesquely overused thumbs. Our bodies just weren't designed to endure the kind of minutely limited-range, repetitive-motion abuse we're now demanding of them. As for the forty year olds, the internet wasn't much when they were coming of age, so I think your vax inference is probably dead on [pun regretfully intended].

— Christophe

Re: Worsening symptoms and more

Date: 2025-04-10 03:44 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I'll try to rephrase a comment that did not go through, in case I had a tone problem the first time.

I had a loved one to whom that happened. This was before covid. His hands became clumsy and weak, and things started to slip out of his grip. He lost the ability to make music or art. He'd also had heart problems, and within a few years, he died "unexpectedly." It now seems likely that he had a certain uncommon, progressive, fatal, but semi-treatable condition that doctors often miss. I wish that he had been able to find a competent doctor and gotten diagnosed. He had doctors, but none of them put all the pieces together.

Re: Worsening symptoms and more

Date: 2025-04-10 10:25 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I also had a friend that had this happen. However, they'd also just started taking estrogen supplements as a m-to-f trans. We joked about how clearly that's how we knew that the hormones were beginning to take effect, as soon they'd need help opening jars.

Re: Worsening symptoms and more

Date: 2025-04-13 03:08 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
That's very sad.

PS Female here, and in my household I'm the one always called open to open jars. My secret trick is (seriously) chi. When that fails, there's a jar opener thingy in the top kitchen drawer.

Re: Worsening symptoms and more

Date: 2025-04-10 01:32 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
This is interesting. I use a chiropractor that does the network/gentle chiropractic. A few years ago, unrelated to covid or vaccines, just a general talk about chiropractic, they mentioned that one of the signs in people of decreasing vitality was grip strength. This was one of the things they tested for and if finding decreased grip strength would focus on freeing up the vertebrae in such a way that the nervous system rebooted some and then improved grip strength would be a sign that they cleared that blockage out of the body and it returned to a healthier, slower aging. fwiw.

Re: Worsening symptoms and more

Date: 2025-04-11 03:01 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] stubborn_ass
Very good point. From previous readings, I knew that grip strength is directly related to mortality/longevity. I guess a simple explanation/visualization is that the hands are at one extreme from the brain, so if the neuro-signals are already misfiring, then it's just a matter of time before the problems become apparent elsewhere in the body, closer to the brain.

So the jabbed folks having new hand issues now .. is an early warning sign, which I think many other vexed folks had missed before noticing bigger issues seemingly overnight.

Re: Worsening symptoms and more

Date: 2025-04-10 01:59 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Not around here. Back around 2015 or so, I would see what looked like an ambulance permanently parked in front of the local Wal-Mart and I made the observation that most of the shoppers looked like they were 3 hospital visits away from the grave. I noticed shortly thereafter that Wal-Mart was offering low-cost medical screenings for its shoppers.

Then that for some strange reason subsided. The Ambulance went back into hiding. I mention all of this (and to get back to your point of observations) to report that The Ambulance seems to have come back from wherever it was hiding to once again be permanently parked in front of the local Wal-Mart.

Most likely due to the worsening health of its shoppers. The real question though, the one that will bring out the propagandists, is why is the health of the populace in decline once again?

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-09 12:41 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Ontario schools begin suspending students who aren't fully vaccinated
Experts say they may be fewer suspensions if Ontario had electronic immunization registry

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ontario-schools-suspend-students-vaccines-1.7505150

'..experts say..'

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-09 12:50 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Bombshell Report from Sec. of Defense Confirms Gateway Pundit Was Correct — Seven Americans Contracted COVID-19-Like Symptoms in Wuhan as Early as October 2019, Months Before the Official Pandemic Timeline

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/04/bombshell-report-sec-defense-confirms-gateway-pundit-was/

things coming out..

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-09 09:29 pm (UTC)
wolf_wobo: A Dog (Default)
From: [personal profile] wolf_wobo
It's interesting that.

Way back before(?) America noticed (2019) that something was going on, Ilargi over at The Automatic Earth was chronicling that something was going on in China. At the time i thought it was strange that he was the only one i was reading at the time who was talking about it. I was told by several people at the time that it was a nothing burger.

I even remember Mrs Pelosi say that we should all go down to chinatiown (sans masks, she was very specific) and protest the xenophobe resident of the white house. As time went on i saw it begin to pick up steam until we got the lock-downs, masks, arbitrary distancing and warp speed.

here we are five years later and they finally admit that something was going on in 2019.

Why, why does it take so long for all of this to "come out" and is it now important?


~Wolf :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-10 01:22 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
This reminds me of a rather odd video that I saw - oh, it must have been in 2022 - made by an American who was living in Wuhan. He said that he got all the symptoms of the 'rona in October 2019, so he was claiming that the virus was released in October at the latest. He also said some pretty alarming things about a high death rate in early 2020: stuff like farmers dropping dead and then their livestock dying because nobody was feeding them. It was a really grisly video and I never thought much about it because there was so little that I could find to confirm it... until now.

Ron M

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-10 07:26 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I first read of this the Friday before Christmas of 2019. I was net surfing and came across a forum discussing the Japanese government's proposal to dump the stored, contaminated water at Fukushima into the ocean. Of course, the comments were scathing. However, one comment stood out. It was from a doctor in Hong Kong who wrote that this was NOT the only stupid decision he had heard of lately. He went on to report that a colleague of his in Wuhan had told him that there had been a serious accident at a "bio-weapons facility" (his term) in that city back in October, 2019. I remember thinking to myself that this could not be good. This doctor went on to say that his colleague warned him that the authorities were not being forthright nor were they dealing with the situation properly so there were already a great many people who were seriously ill.

Stupidly, I did not bookmark the site and I could not find it in late January, 2020 when the COVID saga took off in earnest. However, I told my family that I was sure that this report was genuine and that this was the true story i.e. it did NOT come from a wet-market. Besides, that tale had already been used to explain AIDS.

Liam in Toronto

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-12 03:33 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Wait, AIDS was supposed to have come from a wet-market? I thought their favorite tale was that the AIDS epidemic had descended from one particularly randy airline steward, run amok at the bath houses.

Or wait another second, was that what you meant by wet-market? Oops, that's just an association I had never quite put together before. Sorry, my bad!

— Christophe

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-10 07:14 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Which leads to an interesting coincidence:

The last time The Military World Games occurred was on October 18-29th, 2019.

In Wuhan.

I'll leave it at that. Not a fan of Conspiracy Theorizing, but…

Donald Hargraves

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-10 09:33 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] weilong
Here in my little town in central Japan, nothing resembling epidemic disease happened in 2020 (or thereafter). Hospital occupancy was below normal levels.

on the other hand, I remember being in a meeting with folks at city hall in, oh... must have been July 2020. During a break time, they were talking about how an unusually nasty cold had gone around the office in fall of 2019. It was bad enough that several people (working-age adults) were hospitalized with pneumonia.

So here, at least, if you were looking for a nasty new respiratory virus, you'd have better luck finding it in 2019 than in 2020.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-09 01:25 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Funny meme

https://x.com/butterflyspeir/status/1909957516814934285

24-5 flu vaccine study

Date: 2025-04-09 03:23 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Not covid, but I thought it might be of use to the community: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.01.30.25321421v3

This is a preprint of a study on this last season's flu vaccines, finding: "the risk of influenza was significantly higher for the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated state (HR, 1.27; 95% C.I., 1.07 – 1.51; P = 0.007), yielding a calculated vaccine effectiveness of −26.9% (95% C.I., −55.0 to −6.6%)."

If you have family who are still big on The Science, you may find this study useful to explain why they got flu this winter, and your general suspicion and refusal to take vaccines looks less . . . UnScientific . . . with a nice shiney new study.

I've already sent it to my aged and ill The Science trusting relative, who will no doubt forget it by next flu season, but this should end the fussing at me for this one.

BoysMom

Re: 24-5 flu vaccine study

Date: 2025-04-09 06:31 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
How tactful, "we were unable to find that the vaccine has been effective". Though Gawd knows we tried. Heh, heh.

Had they found a 26% relative benefit, it would have been meaningless because of unmeasured confounders. So, to be unbiased, I must say that a relative detriment also is unreliable due to potential confounding by indication. These are Cleveland Clinic employees and 82% got the flu shot. A small minority (18%) may be assumed to be different somehow. Maybe they work in less-public roles and such people did not get the shot because they correctly estimated that they were at much less risk of exposure than their colleagues, or because unvaxxed patient-care staff would be punished by being made to mask all winter and they wouldn't. You can't correct for these things.

The upshot: ONLY randomized placebo-controlled trials of preventive interventions can provide evidence of benefit.

Re: 24-5 flu vaccine study

Date: 2025-04-10 09:33 am (UTC)
scotlyn: balancing posture in sword form (Default)
From: [personal profile] scotlyn
"The upshot: ONLY randomized placebo-controlled trials of preventive interventions can provide [sufficiently convincing to some] evidence of benefit."

If I may, I will push back against this just a little.

Firstly, we do not live in a world in which we can stand back, control all the variables, study the resulting picture, and THEN make decisions. The world in which we actually each make decisions and acton them, does not consist of controllable variables, for a start. It consists of independently motivated and self-moving agents, other than ourselves, who often work at cross-purposes with one another, and with us.

The randomized placebo-controlled trial has specific uses, and is poorly adapted for other uses.

Specific use number one. Marketing. From a sales point of view, these trials are expensive to run, and therefore suited to use for patentable products that can command high prices, and not for inexpensive, easily accessed products already in the public domain. However, giving a special "cachet" to this kind of trial, in and of itself, can bias the purchaser towards what is expensive, patented, exotic, and away from what is cheap, ordinary, well known. The "double blind" aspect of these kinds of trials is useful to keep the marketing focus on the *product* and away from the potential healing contribution that a physician or patient makes.

Specific use number two. Purchasing. If you are a large public universal payers, or a large private insurance company tasked with making large pharmaceutical product purchases, you will want assurance that your purchases will provide more benefit than harm on a statistical basis - ie that more individual people are likely to benefit than are likely to suffer harm. The randomised (and double blind) placebo-controlled trial can suitably provide this kind of *statistical* information.

Specific use number three. Medical practice. Here a physician finds themselves consulting with an *individual* patient, and suddenly the RCT is of very little use. While it may provide a basic framework within matters of safety and risk can be discussed, however it will say nothing at all about whether THIS patient will derive benefit or be harmed by THIS product. The physician, therefore, must draw on other kinds of information - the patient's medical history, the patient's response to treatment, in the context of the physician's clinical experience, allowing comparison between detailed individual case studies, and similar.

In all contexts where individual doctors are recommending, and patients are considering, the use of pharmaceutical products, RCT's prove to be of little benefit, and simple clinical observation and experience, or a patient taking time to weigh up what matters most to them, may do as effective a job. Because all of these contexts are "real world" contexts, where "controlling the variables" is neither possible, nor desirable.

Re: 24-5 flu vaccine study

Date: 2025-04-10 02:58 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
well said scotlyn.

Re: 24-5 flu vaccine study

Date: 2025-04-10 09:58 am (UTC)
scotlyn: balancing posture in sword form (Default)
From: [personal profile] scotlyn
And... to push back just a LITTLE more...

Evidence is all around us, all the time, and useful evidence in relation to the effectiveness and/or safety of pharmaceutical products (the specific topic under discussion here), is available to every user of a product, to every prescriber of a product, to every family member or close friend or associate of a user of a product, should any of those individuals choose to pay attention.

Evidence is that which is seen, and it is typical of an expert class that they wish the rest of us to think that the only evidence which *counts* is that which is hidden to the ordinary person, but miraculously revealed to the credentialled expert.

But, you know, "the plural of anecdote IS data" (as Raymond Wolfinger *actually* said - though he is frequently misquoted - http://blog.danwin.com/don-t-forget-the-plural-of-anecdote-is-data/); and likewise, "the singular of data is anecdote" (as this blogger muses - https://blogs.iq.harvard.edu/the_singular_of), which means that evidence is what any of us may SEE, if we choose to pay attention.

And, finally, what experts choose to tell us, when they've expensively controlled the variables, and compiled the statistics, and presented them to their peers, may STILL fail to convince, if it contradicts what ordinary people can easily *see* happening all around them.

Re: 24-5 flu vaccine study

Date: 2025-04-10 06:38 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Let me clarify. The sort of evidence that "everyone can see" is when someone feels bad, and a new treatment makes them feel so much better that it can't be natural improvement. Or when they start a drug and suddenly have muscle pain and brain fog like never before; it's likely a side effect (certainly so if they quit the drug and it goes away).

I specified that only RTCs supply useful information on the BENEFIT of PREVENTIVE medicines, which is a very different case from either of the above. How do you know that drugs taken by healthy people, out of fear of future disease, work to prevent this or that condition? This is not something individuals can see. Mom went on a blood thinner and then didn't have a stroke in the next year, so can you conclude it saved her from that experience? You cannot, because there was a 98.5% chance she wouldn't have had one anyway.

No non-randomized, data-dredging study can ever provide answers on the size of benefit in such cases, because people who choose to take medications to reduce supposed risks are different from those who choose not to. So the drug-vendors dig through a database and "show" that some drug either reduces the risk of every condition in the book, or at least doesn't increase the risk of conditions it in fact DOES cause.

So we get claims that covid vaxxes reduce your risk of being injured in automobile accidents. Suuuure. People who were quick to be vaxxed were more fearful, so they and perhaps their friends and family drive more cautiously. It is literally impossible to correct for such confounding factors.

Re: 24-5 flu vaccine study

Date: 2025-04-11 03:17 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
"The sort of evidence that "everyone can see" is when someone feels bad, and a new treatment makes them feel so much better that it can't be natural improvement."

That line reminds me of how I've long found it interesting that despite all the pharmaceutical ads and propaganda out there, I never see ads for antibiotics...one of (or maybe the only) widely-used prescription drugs that seems to fit the above criteria.

Re: 24-5 flu vaccine study

Date: 2025-04-11 11:44 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Precisely. When penicillin hit the market, the modern clinical trial and drug development methodologies now required in the West had not yet been developed. It was just obvious that it worked. Same for aspirin and the like.

Also, it's a waste of money to advertise for antibiotics, because you only take them for a couple of weeks. The TV ads are for things they want you to keep on pounding for the rest of your life.

Re: 24-5 flu vaccine study

Date: 2025-04-12 04:58 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Well, not exactly the same for aspirin. That miracle drug got a serious test run on an unsuspecting populace in 1918 during the Spanish flu epidemic. Various US military departments, copycating one after another, endorsed giving lethal doses of aspirin as treatment for that influenza epidemic. Unsurprisingly, such lethal doses of aspirin induce the exact terminal spiral that was instead attributed to the Spanish flu, namely drowning in one's own lung fluids.

As Scotlyn wrote, had doctors, patients, or family paid attention to what they were witnessing, they could easily have figured out what was causing the spate of sudden deaths. Alas, due to quarantining, family was not allowed to witness enough details to put two and two together, while the patients were either too poisoned or eventually too dead to remember the details. It was the good doctors who failed to draw the obvious conclusions, which they were in the best position to witness and deduce, all because so-called "authorities" had given them unquestionable "health protocols" to blindly follow.

Were that walk down memory lane to remind you a little too closely of the covid ventilator scandal, where intubated patients ended up having a much lower survival rate than those left to breathe on their own, your unease could easily be explained away. You see, everyone is supposed to put their unwavering trust in so-called "authorities", thereby ignoring any life experiences they were actually around to witness. On the one hand, it's called memory holing; on the other hand, it's called acting like a good doctor. Obedience to sacred "protocols" (such as randomized control trials) is what sets scientists and doctors so far above the rest of us poor plebs, who are left outcast in the darkness to rely on our paltry observations and unquantifiable remembrances, a dreaded excommunication... which many of us have now grown quite fond of.

As for aspirin, you’re quite correct; it was indeed just obvious that it worked... at certain doses. It was equally obvious that it killed at certain other doses, but for some unknown reason none of the trusted “authorities” could arrive at that painfully (or perhaps even deadly) obvious conclusion. And that was long before those “authorities” could be publicly shamed into greater lockstep conformity by flagellating them with reams of randomized control studies. The glamour of protective “protocols” handed down by unquestionable so-called “authorities” [read: Dogmas] is nothing new in ersatz religions; it’s more of a hackneyed cliché, in fact. Our Dogmas kill as effectively in the age of covidiocy as they did in 1918, the allure of randomized control studies notwithstanding.

— Christophe

Re: 24-5 flu vaccine study

Date: 2025-04-11 12:45 pm (UTC)
scotlyn: balancing posture in sword form (Default)
From: [personal profile] scotlyn
Fair enough.

So, if we restrict ourselves to "drugs taken by healthy people, out of fear of future disease", then we are in the domain of gambling - ie playing the odds.

From the point of view of any individual person making a decision as to whether to take this punt, the sole value of an RCT is to provide the same benefit that a bookmaker provides to their punters, giving a fair assessment of odds. The punter then decides whether those odds stack up, for them. With no guarantee of success... it's gambling, after all! Odds are odds, not certainties.

The only thing that I would add to this, though, is that the standard of safety that should apply to drugs taken by healthy people, out of fear of future disease, is of the very highest and most rigourous. There should be a near zero chance of that drug taking away ANY of the health the person already enjoys, otherwise the uncertain prospect of not getting a feared disease that might never happen anyway, is a bet worth forgoing.

Re: 24-5 flu vaccine study

Date: 2025-04-11 11:47 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Well, that's how I feel. If nature does something to me, that's how it goes; if I pay good money to have it happen, I'll be infuriated.

But it could also logically depend upon the likelihood of benefit, the likelihood of harm, and how much value or disvalue you put on each potential outcome. Whether you're at 100% health or not (who of us is, past 30?) has little to do with that.

Re: 24-5 flu vaccine study

Date: 2025-04-12 07:41 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Don't forget how many courtesans and women of noble birth in the late Roman empire were perfectly willing to undergo the risks of consuming minute doses of belladonna in order to dilate their pupils, in the hope of convincing their conquests of their true and abiding affection. Or how about today's society set, willing to hack themselves to oblivion with plastic surgery, in the vain, vain, truly vain hope of convincing their conquests of their true and abiding beauty? Gambling is an addiction after all, so there's really no telling what kind of risks a truly uncontrolled addict might be willing to take to get their next fix. In some cases, the more risky the drug or procedure, the more potent a fix it can offer the gambling addict (Michael Jackson comes to mind.)

Nonetheless, the highest and most rigorous standard of safety should certainly apply to any drugs callously *advertised* at healthy people for the fun and profit of gazillionaires. If addicts want to search out the seediest bookmakers and most nefarious dealers in the furthest backrooms of the meanest streets, that's on them; however, permitting the Fauci's of the world to cripple and then liquidate the unsuspecting is truly beyond the pale. Just another of the unexpected joys of living through a time of civilizational unraveling.

— Christophe

Re: 24-5 flu vaccine study

Date: 2025-04-12 05:53 pm (UTC)
scotlyn: balancing posture in sword form (Default)
From: [personal profile] scotlyn
Well, you are correct that the weighing up of "the odds" is personal to each punter, and that is why, in the honest world of book-making, the punter knows that when you place your bet it may win, BUT it may lose... You never walk into a bookmakers without knowing that you may lose your shirt (should you decide to wager it)...

In the dishonest world of drugs, we are continually offered "odds" that are:
1) statistically gamed to oversell potential benefits and undersell potential harms...
2) presented as the "prudent" thing to do; or as the socially conscious and unselfish thing to do...
3) aimed at training us to see ourselves as bundles of risk that we are responsible for managing well...

...and that dishonesty prevents us from detecting that (whenever we are speaking of those classes of drugs aimed at prevented a feared disease, or lowering a risk factor), we have entered a casino, where the house always wins.

Re: 24-5 flu vaccine study

Date: 2025-04-13 06:50 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Odds happen to be a particularly challenging abstraction for our little primate brains to rationally judge and compare. We will all fail to accurately predict the likelihood of two unlikely outcomes occurring consecutively until we manage to discover how to override our instinctual presumptions by utilizing some corrective calculating method, such as multiplying odds together. More often, we simply revert to ingrained emotional reactions whenever confronted with odds of much complexity or subtlety. That’s part of why we cling so desperately to black-or-white dichotomies and can so easily be herded into strident emotional entrenchment when confronted with nuance or uncertainty of outcome. Con artists, card sharks, and snake-oil salesmen depend on our odds-illiteracy and their own odds-facility to fleece us for all we’re worth.

I’m particularly fond of applied kinesiology as a divination practice because the part of our soul that muscle testing allows us to communicate with, the embodied part that dwells on the physical plane, is exceptionally gifted at keeping track of and comparing multiple codependent odds and likelihoods. The embodied part of our soul is the part that is continuously monitoring, extrapolating, and then adjusting the rates of all the various subconscious systems that keep our organism alive. Core temperature compared to the extremities, cross-reference that with blood pressure fluctuation upon rising from sitting, plus low salt levels and high blood sugar, add a dash of dehydration, vasodilation from recent emotional stimulation, that ongoing arrhythmia, and a lack of several nutrients in the bloodstream. “Quick, conscious mind, figure out which ones need to be adjusted in which directions simultaneously to achieve homeostasis! Oops, not quick enough — you die.” Yeah, our souls really are that much wiser and more talented than our headstrong little conscious minds care to admit. Heck, that simplified example didn’t even touch on any the subtle plane influences and parasites that our souls have to continuously take into account.

Such extraordinary horsepower, steered by such an obtuse charioteer! Thank the gods that that charioteer goes to sleep each night, so the soul gets a fighting chance to try to rebalance its various levels without constant distraction. Of course, in the hands of an uncommonly clueless charioteer, any divination practice can get dreadfully corrupted. A conscious mind that manipulatively attempts to exploit its soul by abusing any method of divination will very quickly discover precisely how much wiser and more talented its soul is, as that soul carefully calculates exactly what answers its consciousness actually needs to learn from, rather than what its consciousness had hoped to gain from. Each soul is perpetually steering its conscious awareness towards what it needs to learn, but those lessons come so much more easily when the ambitious charioteer is not cynically trying to rein in and exploit the soul's natural goodwill.

So, the embodied part of the soul can do all kinds of complex calculations of overlapping causes with complementary responses in order to obtain optimal outcomes — that is its daily grind, after all. The trick is to remember that its understanding of causes, responses, and outcomes will always be incomprehensibly more subtle and nuanced than anything the conscious mind can understand. Just as focusing on how to align one’s will with the will of any god one interacts with will considerably improve the results of that divine relationship, so focusing on coming into alignment with one’s soul will considerably improve the results of that lifelong partnership.

In this casino world we will always find ourselves dealing with statistical gaming, social shaming, and manipulative training. Our soul learned all about those dishonest techniques long ago, and our conscious mind is always learning from and relating to our soul’s wisdom, even when it doesn’t want to, even when it’s desperately trying to run away from that wisdom. It takes an awful lot of lifetimes to finally relinquish trying to escape from the soul’s deep wisdom, then quite a few more to get the hang of actually aligning with the soul and its purpose in coming into incarnation. As long as we keep running off with our fingers in our ears, it's our own dishonesty that prevents us from detecting our soul’s wisdom. Once we stop all that frantic running and actually listen, we're able to hear our soul clarifying those dishonest techniques, calculating the complex odds, and clearly warning us “That shot will be the death of you.” The house only wins when we’re running scared away from our Selves.

— Christophe

Re: 24-5 flu vaccine study

Date: 2025-04-13 01:56 pm (UTC)
scotlyn: balancing posture in sword form (Default)
From: [personal profile] scotlyn
Excellent riposte, Christophe - thank you!

"we will always find ourselves dealing with statistical gaming, social shaming, and manipulative training..." (nicely phrased)

"The house only wins when we’re running scared away from our Selves... [and when we play a different game of our own choosing, the house loses.]"

Yes. Exactly. :)

Re: 24-5 flu vaccine study

Date: 2025-04-14 02:09 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Yes, and have you noticed how consistently the house has been losing and running scared, ever since we learned how to play an altogether different game? Once the 2022 great implosion of covid-hysteria began picking up steam, the bumbling idiots who fancied themselves the casino's owners went into a panicked tizzy, frantically trying to run away from what their souls well knew to be true all along. Had those wannabe despots taken into account the inescapable blowback their panic-mongering ensorcellments would eventually precipitate, perhaps they would not have begun their descent down that frightfully ill-considered course in the first place.

But they did, and their games began. Their resulting self-immolation has turned into a delightfully cathartic sight to behold, has it not? Let's do be as generous as possible towards those self-styled Capitol-dwellers, and extend to them our most sincerest of wishes, "May the odds be ever in your favor..."

— Christophe

Re: 24-5 flu vaccine study

Date: 2025-04-14 11:46 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
> Let's do be as generous as possible towards those self-styled Capitol-dwellers, and extend to them our most sincerest of wishes, "May the odds be ever in your favor..."

Such a chronically underrated story, I'm certain Suzanne Collins has significant prescience.

Re: 24-5 flu vaccine study

Date: 2025-04-13 02:04 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
"aimed at training us to see ourselves as bundles of risk that we are responsible for managing well"

What a perfect description! You've just absolutely nailed my feelings about that worldview.

Re: 24-5 flu vaccine study

Date: 2025-04-13 08:08 pm (UTC)
scotlyn: balancing posture in sword form (Default)
From: [personal profile] scotlyn
Just to say that that all credit for that phrasing properly belongs to Ivan Illich who wrote a great deal about how changes in medical practice during the 20th century actually transformed our relationships with our own bodies to something very different... If this topic interests you, you might check out the blog of David Cayley who wrote posts and a book on the topic, as well as making several broadcasts. :)

https://www.davidcayley.com/ivanillich

Re: 24-5 flu vaccine study

Date: 2025-04-11 01:34 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
If you read the whole preprint, you'll see that all employees were required to get the shot unless they had medical or religious exemptions.
So, your theory that people didn't get the shot because they assessed their risk as lower is not supported by the study.

Indeed, I went and tracked down the preprint instead of sharing one of the many articles about it exactly so I could see if there were any obvious confounding factors. The only one I see that's not excluded by the study description is that if folks have an exemption for one vaccine they usually have it for a whole bunch of vaccines, so interactions between previous vaccines and this one, or damage to the immune system from previous vaccines, is not going to be able to be teased out from problems with this vaccine.

BoysMom

Re: 24-5 flu vaccine study

Date: 2025-04-12 02:12 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Great point, thanks for making it. However, people who get exemptions may ALSO be different. For example, no major religious sect prohibits flu shots. Requests for religious exemptions are based on individual feelings and conscience, and if you see your personal risk of a disease as low you may be more likely to pursue an exemption. Those who have medical exemptions may have health problems that make it more likely that they will get sick, but those people may also avoid close contact or wash their hands more often because they feel more vulnerable, reducing their risk.

When I read a report of a non-randomized study, I always ask: Can I come up with reasons why people in group 1 might be at higher risk than group 2? And reasons that they might be lower risk? Almost always, the answer is yes, which means that results are not trustworthy.

In this case, it is very interesting that the hazard ratio was 1.27 both before and after adjustment for "age, sex, clinical nursing job, and primary employment location." Often in studies that push an intervention, or that seek to demonize an alternative intervention, you'll see something like "risk ratio 2.1, after adjustment for [just a few demographic items that were in the records] risk ratio 1.4" and then they blare about the 1.4 as if it were holy writ. But in fact, what they've shown is that there are huge confounding factors and they cannot possibly have identified and corrected for all of them. Here, adjustment for age and job doesn't make a difference, which suggests that the effect is real.

Strange that the media aren't covering this...

Irish Skin

Date: 2025-04-09 03:55 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Went to the skin doctor Monday for my annual sun spot check something I have done for over 40 years. They did there thing with nitrogen and then the big surprise giving you a RX for Mupirocin Ointment. Ok may I also have a refill and why! Lots of folks when being treated for sun spots are now getting infections. Decided not to ask if they were vax. So by the end of the month will have 2 tubes of something I never plan on using. Take Care Blueberry

Re: Irish Skin

Date: 2025-04-09 05:05 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Have you come across skin-related article by a midwestern doctor?

Re: Irish Skin

Date: 2025-04-10 12:41 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
And curious outlier on Substack has also posted about using chlorine dioxide for skin issues.

Re: Ahem.

Date: 2025-04-10 01:21 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I think this week already has the most warnings from you of any weekly post yet - and it's only Wednesday. Has there been some sort of giant influx of trolls or are people just more enraged than usual or is it AI or are the stars in a wacky alignment or...? It just seems like something out of the ordinary is going on this week and I'm wondering why!

Re: Ahem.

Date: 2025-04-10 02:07 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Not just the stock market, it's general, seen it in younguns who don't have anything to do with markets at all.

Re: Ahem.

Date: 2025-04-10 05:49 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] brendhelm
If I may hazard a guess, it's some combination of the following:

- Neptune in Aries. On its own it may not mean much, but it's making transits with people's natal charts that previously would have been in Pisces, yielding energy that's more bellicose than it would have been this time last month.

- Follow-on effects of the March 29 eclipse. With retrograde, cadent (thus weak) Mercury in Aries, Mars is its dispositor, and angular Mars in Cancer is in mutual reception with the eclipsed Moon in Aries. With Venus also retrograde, all this seems to be suggestive of "bad behavior" when it comes to communication.

- There has been some discussion in various Magic Mondays and these threads that the "black oobleck" some have noticed may be making its way from the astral to the etheric. I have personally noticed that over the past month I've had many unusually vivid, often disturbing or violent dreams, and have also felt stiff/sore and been feeling fatigue and pain more frequently with no obvious physical cause. I can't read auras; I am wondering if those who can have noticed any difference recently in people's auras.

- The tumult in the stock market may indeed play a role - even the young and personally uninvested will have parents, friends(' parents), bosses, older coworkers etc. who have 401k's or are otherwise invested, and their stress is tugging on any egregors they may be a part of.

Re: Ahem.

Date: 2025-04-11 03:23 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
We're getting off topic for covid, but thanks for the observations. A lot of things seem really "off" to me of late - people acting weirder and maybe more distant or even hostile than usual, as well as a lot of physical illness, ranging from seasonal respiratory viruses to diagnosis of serious cancers. I've also had some vague feeling for a few weeks now of things being somehow "off" - like I'm waiting for the other shoe to drop, but I'm not sure in what way. Maybe other people will have additional insights on the next Magic Monday.

Re: Ahem.

Date: 2025-04-11 05:32 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
For us Canadians, it might have something to do with the upcoming Federal election.

Caldathras

Re: Ahem.

Date: 2025-04-11 01:40 pm (UTC)
charlieobert: (Default)
From: [personal profile] charlieobert
...and all this time I've been picturing you with a Silver Hammer...

Covid/Medical World

Date: 2025-04-09 10:12 pm (UTC)
wolf_wobo: A Dog (Default)
From: [personal profile] wolf_wobo
So, i know Nakedcapitalism is "frowned" upon around here But: Before they elected themselves the Doctors for the country (I Think a lot of that came from Lambert and he is gone now) they were One of the premiere sites regarding finance and the 2008 financial "crisis." So, you say, so what has that got to do with covid/medical industrial complex? Well allow me to elucidate (Sorry for the long quote, i think it is relevant):

Trump is proposing to make this dire situation worse by sanctioning pharmaceuticals. As we wrote in 2018 in China Rx: How the US Depends on China for Its Drugs:

The big message of [Rosemary] Gibon’s and [Janardan] Singh’s book is that the US relies on China for the production of active ingredients in drugs and in many cases, of the medications themselves, to the degree that we would have a public health crisis if supplies were interrupted. As Gibson said on C-SPAN:

"Many people that we spoke to, both former government officials and some in industry said that if China shut the door on exports, within months, pharmacy shelves in the United States to be empty, and hospitals would cease to function."

And don’t assume generics king India would step into the breach. India gets many of the active ingredients for its pharmaceuticals from China. Gibson forecasts that China will overtake India in generics manufacture within a decade.

As Gibson explains, the US no longer makes its own penicillin, in part because China dumped penicillin in 2004, driving the last US plant out of business.

The medications where the US relies on China include heparin, a blood thinner that among other things is used for IV drips. No heparin, no IV treatments. Due to the difficulty in tracing the source of drug company ingredients, the authors could make only case by case investigations, but they found China production to be critical for treatments for Alzheimer’s HIV, depression, schizophrenia, cancer, epilepsy, and high blood pressure.


Now, i know most of us here at least occasionally take Something, Aspirin Ibuprofen, ivermectin etc etc so i thought this might be something useful. Maybe stock up? I don't know.

there is more at: https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2025/04/trumps-additional-50-tariff-against-china-and-chinas-tit-for-tat-retaliation-trump-own-goals-himself-into-where-china-would-want-him.html

~Wolf

Current state of medical studies

Date: 2025-04-10 01:55 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] stubborn_ass
For context, my impression was that Bret Weinstein still believed in the system when the covid era started. It took him about 6 months to a year before he realized it stank to high heavens and many things were not kosher. So he stuck his neck out then. Kudos for that... unlike the Dr Campbell who put out daily videos and shied away from the logical conclusions for years before finally having acknowledging what he was seeing. Campbell came so close so many times, which I kept tabs on, as I used that as a barometer of how the average person who had benefitted from the system, was 'educated' and then presented with actual evidence that was quite contrary to the worldview that they've built up - how soon before they came to the stage of acceptance.

I found the following transcript quite relevant, especially given last week's thread where someone kept asking for more medical studies to show how bad the shots are. I mentioned that the ethicalskeptic has put in time and effort to piece together data, he said he knew about and wants even more, so give him the links etc. I didn't get angry or offended, as it was a Campbell situation - they are still in the throes of denial, it is what it is. He said he knew the medical system/ research function was compromised, and he's asking for more official studies to show how bad the shots are? Researchers have snucked in useful tidbits wherever they could, in order to get past the official censors, and we've pieced together many dots. Whether one wants to see the picture, it really is up to them.

https://x.com/newstart_2024/status/1908949418822300117

Bret Weinstein: "They are hiding everything. And what I mean by that is that they are sabotaging all of the mechanisms that we would normally use to figure out what's true. And that sounds like a wild exaggeration, but it isn't. The fact is it's not even just a an attack on the university system."

"It's an attack on every single university. The research done there is low quality, not repeatable. The lessons taught there are actually, in large measure, not even true anymore. Things that are verifiably false are taught as if they are true. Our regulatory agencies work exactly in reverse."

"They protect regulators from from citizens, not the other way around. So something is attacking all of the mechanisms in civilization that are supposed to seek the truth and act upon it, and that's not a coincidence."

"Our, truth seeking apparatus has been under such intense attack. We don't know what's true. Some things that are very easy to establish. It's not a difficult scientific question to figure out whether or not mRNA vaccines cause turbocancers."

"That's a very straightforward scientific problem, but we are nonetheless left to grapple with anecdote because to the extent that there are studies, they're likely to be set up to fail, and the rest is anecdote."

"So we are left to make sense of the world without the most obvious basic tools, without anything that flows to us from the enlightenment, and that is indeed a very dangerous predicament."

Re: Current state of medical studies

Date: 2025-04-10 03:57 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Dr. Campbell didn't "shy away from the logical conclusions." (At least not by my definition of the phrase.) He would have been deplatformed if he had uttered the logical conclusions. He spoke elliptically, and even put up signs on his walls, to lead people to arrive at those conclusions without himself speaking them out loud. Intellectuals have always had to do such things to pursue truth under censorship regimes, and those who would learn from them have always had to learn to read between the lines. But westerners haven't had to do it for a lifetime, because we've had mostly-free speech. I thought Campbell did a fine job of dissenting as best he could and deserved major credit for it.

It indeed shouldn't be difficult, scientifically, to determine whether mRNA vaxxes could cause fast-growing or aggressive cancers. The obvious starting point would be animal studies. As you say, Pfizer and Moderna's animal studies can't be trusted to be done right or reported accurately. But, not all nations profited from mRNA shots or widely adopted them. One of those that didn't, and that is now getting screwed over by the U.S., might just think about putting some funding into this. Almost any results, publicly released, could increase anger or divisiveness in the U.S., which is bad for us of course, but good for them.

Re: Current state of medical studies

Date: 2025-04-11 04:28 am (UTC)
p_coyle: (Default)
From: [personal profile] p_coyle
increasing anger or divisiveness in the us sounds like multiplying infinity by 1.2 vs 3. in the immortal words of an angry and divisive pantsuit, "what difference, at this point, does it make?"
Edited (clarity) Date: 2025-04-11 04:30 am (UTC)

Re: Current state of medical studies

Date: 2025-04-11 11:48 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Something about this comment triggers my irony detector.

Re: Current state of medical studies

Date: 2025-04-12 09:06 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] anonymoose_canadian
I think a far more common problem is irony overdoses! ;)

Re: Current state of medical studies

Date: 2025-04-10 08:55 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
It took Weinstein years to wise up. In 2021 a pregnant woman was asking him and his wife, another PhD, if she should get the jab. They prevaricated when the answer should have been a clear NO!!! I knew in January 2021 that the jabs were dangerous - for everyone - it seems the more educated you are, the less common sense you have.

Re: Current state of medical studies

Date: 2025-04-10 03:54 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Education is all about telling authority figures what they want to hear. And being part of a herd, not standing out. Critical thinking and risk taking are either not incentivized or punished.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-10 02:40 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
DOD Welcomes Back Service Members Impacted by COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate

https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/4150566/dod-welcomes-back-service-members-impacted-by-covid-19-vaccine-mandate/

more good news

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-10 06:59 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
It's not surprising that Open Covid Post is getting hit with more crazy that usual. I know JMG doesn't watch videos but some conservatives have been posting their experiences from inside the Hands Off protests this past weekend and it's getting downright scary. The corporate media is literally driving them insane, and creating a tsunami of erratic behavior that's becoming increasingly dangerous.

Here's my article today on the subject as well as some suggestions about how to push back these forces while maintaining as safe a distance as possible.

https://naakua.substack.com/p/the-demons-told-me-to-kill-you

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-10 04:53 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Excellent article! 🙏

I expect the Tesla craziness put my True Blue Covidian brother-in-law in quite a bind: He drives a Tesla in an epicenter of woke near Seattle.

Discussing any of this with my family is a no-go. It’s not about making sense. Just emotions. The Golden Corral all you can eat buffet for noxious spirits.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-11 10:15 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Here in Hawaii they are putting the Elon-with-a-slash-through stickers on their Teslas to keep their allies from damaging them. I have a friend with a first gen model S which has been super reliable and loves it. He mentioned considering getting a Lightning but they have so many problems. The jaws of cognitive dissonance are closing in on all sides already and vax damage is still waiting to blow up. The psychological pressure is already manifesting in a record number of road fatalities this year.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-13 03:21 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
It occurs to me that such folks might do better with a sticker that says THIS TESLA IDENTIFIES AS A JAGUAR.

What's going to be the next dangerously uncool thing? I wonder. Oh... saying that you took the Pfizer and Moderna covid jabs. What was I thinking.

Seriously, though, it seems to me that, for some years now, there has been this barrage of one thing after another aimed precisely at the things many people take pride in. Of all things, and this is way back, I'm thinking of the attacks on women who were seen wearing fur coats on the streets in New York. I'm also thinking of Disneyland. Many people once loved and took pride in Disneyland.

It's a long list. Hmmm it might include solar panels. Isn't that a wacky notion.

Feelin' the Astral Ooblek and Takin' Note of the Circular Firing squads

(no subject)

Date: 2025-04-13 05:46 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
It occurs to me that such folks might do better with a sticker that says THIS TESLA IDENTIFIES AS A JAGUAR.


ROFL!!! 🤣


Caldathras
Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

Profile

ecosophia: (Default)John Michael Greer

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011 12 1314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 14th, 2025 06:19 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »