ecosophia: (Default)
[personal profile] ecosophia
storm over washingtonI've mentioned here a few times the very disturbing nature of the chart for the upcoming US presidential inauguration.  Yesterday I completed the delineation for the chart; "grim" isn't the half of it. I've decided to post the delineation as an open post, available to everyone whether they've subscribed or not, on my SubscribeStar and Patreon platforms: 

JMG SubscribeStar page (scroll down a bit and you'll find it)

JMG Patreon post page

May I be frank?  This is far and away the most malefic mundane chart I have ever studied. Six of the nine planets are clustered in two tight stelliums that are square to each other, and the other three planets are basically out of the picture. 

I have no idea if Donald Trump or anyone in his inner circle pays the least attention to astrology, but if so, I hope he has the great good sense to button up his ego, let his legal challenges slide, prepare to depart the White House with whatever theatrics he considers appropriate, and thank his lucky stars that he can sit out the next four years and get ready for 2024. Whoever is inaugurated this coming January will be walking face first into a buzzsaw. 

Re: Ruinmen and Green Wizards

Date: 2020-11-18 07:02 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Can you expand a little bit on how much the first house of this chart predicts the conditions of the general populace? I'm a little confused by that--how does this differ in being an inauguration chart, and therefore more about the presidency, versus an ingress chart that is cast for the nation as a whole? You write "This suggests that the great contentions of the time will have little immediate impact on Americans in general" in regards to the first house--but should we take that as a broad statement about average Americans being largely unaffected by the events in the chart, or somehow narrow that down the the presidency itself? You seem to be saying more the latter in your comments here.

It all feels a little incongruous, the many bad portents in the chart and then the idea that it will not have great effect on the populace. That does make me think that this is not predicting a civil war--or even a major domestic insurgency--as I don't see how that could remain divorced from the well-being of the general population. I am reading this more as there being a lot of sturm und drang in regards to the politics of the next however many years, but that it will not spread out into the full country to the degree that most people don't continue to go on with their lives with the background chaos of a politics gone mad. Would that be a proper interpretation?

I am similarly curious about your statement in the second house that "The background of economic life can thus expect to improve where the turmoil predicted by the aspects does not bear down too heavily." Granted, it's a pretty qualified statement (if the turmoil is extreme, it may bear down heavily in many places!) but should we take that as a somewhat decent outlook for the economy for the next presidency, or is this a bit more about how much the national economy will effect the presidency specifically?

Thanks for any clarification you can provide!
Page generated May. 22nd, 2025 05:17 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »