ecosophia: (Default)
[personal profile] ecosophia
No one expects the Spanish inquisitionI fielded a distinctly unexpected email the other day from a Wiccan I've met several times in a professional context. The topic was a book of mine; more to the point, the topic was this person's insistence that the book in question was wrong, wrong, wrong -- oh, and did I mention wrong? -- because the practices and teachings it included aren't the same as the ones that you'll find in use in your common or garden variety American eclectic Wiccan coven. 

What made this startling to me is that I never claimed anywhere that the book conformed to American eclectic Wicca. I wouldn't have imagined that anyone would expect me to do so -- after all, ahem, I'm a Druid, which is not the same thing, and a Druid in the traditions of the 18th and 19th century Druid Revival, which is emphatically not the same thing. It's not just that we keep our robes on during ritual, though of course that's true; it's also that the teachings, symbolism, practices, and philosophy taught in Druid Revival traditions differ sharply, and not just in superficial ways, from those you'll find in American eclectic Neopaganism. Thus insisting that a book by a Druid is wrong because it doesn't conform to American eclectic Wicca is roughly on a par with insisting that a book by a Buddhist is wrong because it doesn't talk about Jesus and quote the Bible. 

Two possible explanations for this odd tirade occur to me. The first is that the person in question was simply melting down about my political writings online, which of course don't support the sort of mainstream liberalism that's standard in many Neopagan circles these days, and (worse still) don't conform to the mainstream liberal stereotype of the only alternative to mainstream liberalism. (I've found that many American liberals these days react far more heatedly to, say, a moderate political stance than they do to actual fascism; I think it's because, given the increasingly shrill moral dualism that pervades American political discourse these days, the existence of any viewpoint other than the extremes causes a pretty fair case of cognitive dissonance in those who've bought into the claim that the only alternative to their own viewpoint is some suitably mustached variety of evil incarnate.)

The second is rather more troubling, at least to my mind. There's always been a certain tendency among many members of the eclectic Wiccan mainstream in the US to treat what they do as real Paganism and relegate everyone else in the Neopagan scene -- Druids, Heathens, polytheists of various kinds, and so on -- to a kind of second-class status. That's typical, and though it can be annoying, most of those of us who've been assigned that status have learned to live with it when dealing with the Neopagan community. Over the last few years, though, I've noticed a hardening of boundaries on the part of the mainstream, and the first signs of an effort to impose doctrinal and ritual uniformity on the entire scene. So far, this has usually been presented in velvet-soft forms -- "I just want to see every Pagan joining together in one big tent, all singing 'We all come from the Goddess'" and that sort of thing -- but you don't have to be a weather mage to tell which way the wind is blowing. 

So I'm wondering whether other people outside the American eclectic Wiccan mainstream have begun to field anything like the kind of diatribe I got. As Monty Python reminded us, no one expects the Spanish Inquisition...but I'm beginning to wonder whether it's time for those of us who aren't part of the mainstream to keep a weather eye out for Neopagan fundamentalism. 

(no subject)

Date: 2018-08-25 11:01 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I have noticed a fair few supposed Asatruar who are very triggered by my Heathenism not being the same standard Ctrl-left universalist dogma flavored up in horny helmets, plastic Mjolnirs and plastic Ralph Blum rune sets.

the Inquisition

Date: 2018-08-25 11:22 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Dear JMG,

I have been a Wiccan of one kind or another for over forty years. OMGs, how did that happen? :) Currently I circle with a coven of California Line Gardnarians. Everyone I know has noticed a falling off in students looking for teaching and initiation in the better known traditions, such as Gardnarian, Alexandrian, etc. and more people claiming to be eclectic, traditional, hedge-witch, etc. Part of this can be attributed to the availability of contacts, groups, texts, etc. online. No more scanning notices at the local occult book store or posting signs written in Theban on phone poles to locate lost contacts. Increased scholarly attention has also affected the scene. The Matriarchal worshipers of the Great Mother Goddess (TM) have disappeared under academic scrutiny as have the unbroken lineages, initiations by grandmothers who would have been shocked to the depths of their Chapel going souls by the suggestion, and other standbys of the 60s, 70s and 80s.

Maybe all of this is leading to a circle the wagons mentality. There was some overlap between the re-constructionist Druids and the Wiccans i.e. Isaac Bonewits of Ar nDraoicht Fein was also a New Reformed Orthodox Order of the Golden Dawn initiate as well as a Gardnarian, and he certainly wasn't the only one with overlapping and somewhat incongruent memberships. Pushing toward greater unity could go either direction; either get all the Druids AND OTOs out of our Wicca or get all those Wiccans out of our Hellenic Temenos.


Rita

Re: decline in students

From: [personal profile] ritaer - Date: 2018-08-26 08:54 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2018-08-25 11:29 pm (UTC)
drhooves: (Default)
From: [personal profile] drhooves
I can't speak to the pagan or Druid experience, but I can say there have been more markers of the "creeping intolerance" you mention in other areas of religion, politics, sports and just all-around social interaction, IMHO.

Personally, I think it can be partly explained by the symptoms of the Long Descent becoming more apparent to more people. Especially younger people, who are waking up to the view down the road is not the one they imagined or wanted.

The good old days, at least for many, appear to be long gone...

(no subject)

Date: 2018-08-26 12:05 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I've noticed it as well. It does seem to be a mix of both religious and political issues that come up. A very large number of pagans I know seem to feel that being anything other than a liberal is somehow incompatible with paganism, and I've gotten kicked out of groups on more than one occasion for not being liberal enough.

I've also noticed that whatever deity the Wiccans are communing with when they talk about the "Goddess" seems a little intolerant and aggressive, from my experience with her. Indeed, she strikes me as being quite dangerous. I don't dispute her power, but her morality is questionable.

What gets me more concerned is that I've noticed an odd sort of moralizing coming from the Wiccans I used to know, which has frankly pushed me away completely. It's not just that they are the real pagans, but also that a large number of them seem to be starting to think that what other pagans do is not just wrong, but fundamentally immoral.

I wonder if what we're witnessing isn't a revitalization movement getting started. Despite what most Wiccans say, they are by and large as committed to the industrial world as the majority of the population, and the strain as this world gives way to a much poorer one, with many more problems, has to be taking its toll. Insisting that Wiccan spirituality can save us, but only if we all hold hands and worship the Goddess together, is a nice way to avoid dealing with that reality.

Will J

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2018-08-27 05:24 pm (UTC) - Expand

polarization wherever you look

Date: 2018-08-26 12:18 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
JMG - I've read that, when John Calhoun gave rats (or mice) unlimited food in a laboratory setting that allowed them to all live together in a common environment, they bred to the point that they got crowded (though still not hungry). When they got crowded, they got cranky. I doubt that they argued about electoral politics, religious affiliation, or whether one drop of brown rat blood in their white-rat genealogy was of any particular significance. They just started nipping at each other. They neglected their young. They demonstrated "sexual perversions" (whatever that meant to the scientists describing it). Now, here we are, increasingly crowded, rationalizing our cranky behavior in every sphere of interaction. Why should neopaganism be exempt? It's just people probing to find out: are you with them, or against them?

Lathechuck

(no subject)

Date: 2018-08-26 01:20 am (UTC)
ashareem: feeling my Roma-Jewish ancestry (very distant!) (Default)
From: [personal profile] ashareem
John, even within American "Traditional" Wicca, we have to do deal with that - and gods help if we happen to be discussing witchcraft other than Wicca to begin with.

(no subject)

Date: 2018-08-26 01:37 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] robertmathiesen
Attempts to impose this sort of totalitarian orthodoxy seem to be a common enough development in the early history of new religious movements. So it is not surprising to find it Neopagan circles, too.

Here are some historical examples: Early Christianity had no shared, uniform list of Christian writings that were considered to be authoritative and inspired Scripture (i.e. the New Testament), much less any shared, uniform theology. (Indeed, if you survey the entire range of Christian Churches with continuous traditions reaching back into late Antiquity, there are still a few minor differences between them as to which books belong to the New Testament and are included in their printed Bibles. Even now, there in no single "Canon" (i.e. table of contents) for the New Testament accepted by all the historic Christian churches. Such uniformity as came to be established within this or that sector of historic Christendom was in every case imposed by force with the aid of secular power politics.

Within Judaism, the ancient Jewish community of Ethiopia -- until most of it was airlifted to Israel in the last quarter of the 20th century -- had not so much as heard of Rabbis, or of the Mishna and Talmud. They still offered animal sacrifices on sacred high places, and they did not know that the Temple in Jerusalem had been destroyed during the first and second centuries of the Common Era. Now that most of the Ethiopian Jewish community has been relocated to Israel, questions of power politics and religious authority are very hot issues in that community, as are the rather striking differences between the Hebrew and the Ethiopian Canons of Jewish Scripture. For Israel, where the Rabbinate has a measure of state-sanctioned civil power, the resolution of these issues has major consequences.

Something quite similar occurred quite early within the New Thought Movement, leading to an eventual hard schism between Mrs. Eddy's variant known as Christian Science and the rest of the movement. Much the same thing led to bitter, bitter schisms within the history of the Theosophical Society. And so forth ...

Within the early history of Gardnerian Wicca in the United States there was something of roughly the same sort going on during the '60s and '70s. Most Gardnerians on this side of the Atlantic descended by initiatory lineages from the Bucklands, Rosemary and Ray, who eventually passed their authority to their favored initiates, Theos and Phoenix (craft names). In California, however, there was a separate initiatory lineage, which seems to have descended from a Gardnerian woman who was active in the San Francisco Bay area for only a year or two before returning to the UK. This was about two years before the Bucklands had initiated anyone. The existence of these two distinct, equally authoritative Gardnerian lineages appears to have been regarded by Theos as a serious problem for American Wicca and a serious challenge to her own position within the Gardnerian community. By various measures, including re-initiations, the Californian lineage was brought under the authority of Theos in ways that (IMHO) had much more to do with the power politics than with religion.

So I expect that the development our host reports here is historically inevitable, or nearly so -- simply due to raw human nature. I shall keep my eyes open now for further examples. We are living in curious and instructive times ...

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] robertmathiesen - Date: 2018-08-26 03:02 am (UTC) - Expand

Gardnarians in Calif.

From: [personal profile] ritaer - Date: 2018-08-26 11:46 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: Gardnarians in Calif.

From: [personal profile] robertmathiesen - Date: 2018-08-27 07:16 am (UTC) - Expand

Neopagan experiences

Date: 2018-08-26 01:41 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
JMG,

I've tried to hang out with a few Neopagan groups and meet people in the community locally. We used to have a Pagan pride day here where I live, but it tanked a few years ago and never came back. I met with an ADF group that would get together with a Wiccan group. It was kind of funny, all the ADF Druids were men, and the women were Wiccans. The ADF guys were friendly enough, and even paid you high compliments when I brought up that I was a fan. I just wasn't interested however in their approach. The Wiccans on the other hand were definitely not nice. They made a joke about throwing my kid in the fire, which scared my son and pissed me off. That was the last time I attempted to hang out with anyone from the local Neopagan community. And frankly from reading some of their blogs from time to time, I've realized that they are going in a different direction then I am interested in going. I'm sure there are great Wiccan people out there, but the ones I met really soured me. They sort of treated me like how they were complaining about how Christians treat them which is weird because I'm definitely a polytheist magic practicing person. I would think we would have more in common. I pretty much just identify myself as an occultist and am good with that.

Best Regards,
Dean Smith

(no subject)

Date: 2018-08-26 03:56 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I have not experienced this myself, probably because I don't belong to any groups or really talk about what I do with anybody outside my house. It took me 10 years of being a regular reader of your various blogs before I even felt comfortable posting to these extremely well moderated forums. However, a couple ideas came to mind that might be pertinent.

I've read Robert Trubshaw's "Anglo-Saxon Twilight" articles several times each. http://www.indigogroup.co.uk/twilight/ He's spent years trying to figure out how the Anglo-Saxons worshipped and what they believed in the years 500 - 900 CE. One of his conclusions is that each and every region worshipped the local spirit of place and that there were no consistent beliefs. I've read this also about the Scandinavian religions of the era. Sorta like modern Druidry. No dogma.

His ideas and some of what you've said agree: the newer monotheist religion required a more uniform belief, action and thought system. We live in a society in which it is impossible to not be impacted by vestiges of this monotheist religion. So, eventually, because that's how we (or our parents and/or grandparents) grew up, and because that's what we're used to, the demand for adherence to an authority, a dogma, will occur.


Some of what you and others have said above, especially regarding the visible failings of the religion of progress, has to be an impetus. Then add in furthur insecurities, including but not limited to the declining membership rates, and because many of us fall under the generalized "Pagan" heading, well, then, we all MUST believe the same and do what the self-appointed authorities decree. We all must be the same or fail. And since Wicca is bigger than all the rest of the groups combined, well, you're seeing what's happening.

It is disconcerting, to say the least.

DJSpo




It ain't just you...

Date: 2018-08-26 04:41 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I strongly suspect the bizarre critique of your work has much to do with the general crackup of the American left. A recent attempt at debate with a Unitarian minister turned into a 45-minute discussion about the rules of debate. Short version: Reality is whatever he wants it to be. Well then there now. Some of the better educated women in my family display a similar shrill, one-zero, bad tempered, mean spirited orthodoxy on a range of issues. Interestingly, they HATE the ideas in Green Wizardry. (Mom likes it. Her influence may prevail.) My working hypothesis is that the end of fossil fuel and other hard limits are also the end of fashionably bohemian lifestyles – and that simply will not do! No more oil means no more energy slaves and no more fashionable feminism. (Gender roles? Social strata? Unthinkable!) Interestingly, people I talk with on the American center to right tend to like Green Wizardry. Hmmm…
Rusty Retrofit, Tower 440 GWB&PA

Re: It ain't just you...

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2018-08-27 05:51 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: It ain't just you...

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2018-08-28 08:39 am (UTC) - Expand

Can’t say I’ve noticed,

Date: 2018-08-26 05:26 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
..but that no doubt is because my practice is solitary and I seldom mix with the “community.” I occasionally attend the rituals of a small long-established Hellenic group, and have been to a few Pantheacons, and that’s about it. I’m unknown to any kind of public, and thus enjoy the advantages of keeping a pretty low profile.

The idea of attempting to compel people to believe what I believe or practice what I practice is repellent to me, and I certainly would resent anyone doing it to me. “That which Is hateful to you, do not do to others.” I didn’t think I’d wind up paraphrasing an ancient rabbi on this, but there it is.

I am always expecting the Spanish Inquisition. I couldn’t help noticing a long time ago that there are always plenty of wannabe Inquisitors around. I suppose it’s the uncomfortable subconscious awareness of this that makes the Python sketch so funny.

Kevin

(no subject)

Date: 2018-08-26 06:31 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] ill_made_knight
I've been keeping a weather eye out for several years. I don't know the contents of the diatribe but, yeah I fielded quite a few run ins over the past decade or so. it is the main reason I have remained aloof and apart from the "American eclectic Wiccan mainstream".
these things are sure proof of 'parallel universes', heh.

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] ill_made_knight - Date: 2018-08-29 11:59 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2018-08-26 08:10 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
While the intolerance that you are describing is not great, I wondered whether there is another concept that might be relevant. The concept that I am thinking of might lead to the type of comment that you have described.

I get a sense that some of us are looking towards what we have in common. There is overlap between Wicca and Druidry even if Druids are less likely to take our clothes off... It may be that the concept of overlap, commonality, is one that is both useful and problematic. Protestants and Catholics know this quite well.

In calling you wrong, wrong, wrong, perhaps the person is trying to squeeze the big tent to Paganism into to a small yurt.

Does that mean we should stop thinking about our commonalities and trying to appreciate them? In my mind no, it simply says this person doesn't understand diversity.

That must have been annoying

Date: 2018-08-26 03:47 pm (UTC)
degringolade: (Default)
From: [personal profile] degringolade
I spent a little time this morning while doing laundry to pencil out a draft of a post over at my place responding to this piece. I will probably publish it later on in the week, but thought that I should respond here first.

The name of the piece will be "Secure the Perimeter"

An old truism. Never a bad habit. If your haven't bothered lately, now is a good time to restart.

But securing the perimeter is useful only in limited ways. Camping, living in a inner city, etc, etc.

John Michael recently wrote an post over at Dreamwidth where he was forcefully reminded that there be some folks who want to shut down anything but their beliefs. I kinda doubt that this is the first time that such a thing has crossed his desk, but apparently this one stung.

I am coming at it from the exact opposite end. Dogma is the rule, not the exception. Now that I am plowing through the "work toward magic" game, I am thinking that staying out of the clutches of the folks who are certain that they know the "right way" is going to take quite a bit of effort and slow down my progress toward the goal. But staying out of the clutches of an organized religion is first and foremost in my educational plans for my dotage.

Dogma is required for a group/organization. No other way around it. Jim Jones was just an extreme example. The Catholic Church's fifteen century run is primarily an outcome of a centralized enforcement of standards.

Head on over to the local Christian congregation and hang out. What you will find is a uniformity of faith and not-too-subtle enforcement of norms. A lot of this comes from the American habit of "congregation shopping", but as the person is assimilated into the collective, their already limited tolerance hardens into cant flavored with pietism.

Well, all the "Alternative" folks have been looking at the formation of new religions. These alternative faiths (and that is what they are) like Wicca and Druid and Chaos and whatever are now just about old enough to start wearing fancy clothes, bossing the little people around, and setting up the 501(c)(3) Corporation.

I can understand John Michael's irritation at being branded an apostate. It would tend to peeve me as well. But the truth of the matter, when you are dealing with faith, there are folks out there who would be more than happy to tie people who disagree with them to a local fencepost and go out an fetch a bunch of 3-5 pound stones to bring to the party.

I kinda doubt that there are very many people out there who would agree with Krishnamurti when he gave his dissolution speech.

John
https://mightaswellliebackandenjoyit.blogspot.com/

(no subject)

Date: 2018-08-26 04:04 pm (UTC)
grokrathegreen: Restoring degraded land. (Default)
From: [personal profile] grokrathegreen
I haven't noticed too much of this, except for as a derivative form of political panic. That being said, there are certainly some pissed off Gods and Goddesses about, and plenty of people keen to connect with them.

To me I have a vague feeling that the Wicca movements Great Mother Goddess has a really big grudge to carry. And, fair enough after the shenanigans Yahweh was up to for so long. Someone asked here about what it is like to be in the middle of two opposing Gods. My thought is that is seems best to not know!

If there is anybody worse than the Romans it's the People's Front of Judea. By which I mean, if you are a Not the Old Guard of Monotheism, then you had better fall in line. No body likes a splitter. Particularly I think that there is a feeling of blood in the water around Old Guard Monotheism, and religious reactions that are opposed to OGM both lust for the opertunity for victory, and in the deep dark hidden chambers of their souls feel that with out their opposition they would have no stopping block to stand on.

Big changes are getting harder to ignore, it is rough on people. That being said, yesterday I was talking to folks at market from a variety of view points, and between the media injected chatter, folks are making quiet tests to find new ways of reaching out to others beyond their own echo chambers. Most are just so timid and scared to reach out beyond the bubble. Some won't the bubbles freeze, shatter, and it is tragic.

A strange thing today is that people are in some many so tiny bubbles that they have a hard time scaling up to big scale trouble. Expect instead a thousand local tragedies.

(no subject)

Date: 2018-08-26 05:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] omerori.wordpress.com
Dear Mr. Greer,

Since we don't have your correspondent's letter in front of us, would it be possible for you to summarize her main claims in a more matter-of-fact way, so that we don't have to solely rely on your parodizing version? It seems only fair, and I really want to know more.

Unless it's too much work for you. Which would be understandable.

Thanks,
Omer

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] omerori.wordpress.com - Date: 2018-08-27 05:07 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] omerori.wordpress.com - Date: 2018-08-27 11:58 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2018-08-26 06:13 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] pretentious_username
Color me mostly unsurprised. (And would I be right in guessing that at some level you're in the same boat and this is just the difference between knowing something intellectually and seeing it firsthand? IIRC you've made comments much like the ones I'm about to make before - Separation of Coven and State back on the Well of Galabes comes to mind.)

One thing I noticed a couple of years back, mulling over the classic American oscillation between politics and religion, is that there's a pattern of American denominations rising during a Great Awakening, becoming politicized during the subsequent political era and next Great Awakening, and dying out thereafter. That's most obvious with the mainline churches who went into the Social Gospel, but from what I can tell the Congregationalists went down the same path during the First and Second Great Awakenings and the churches that went for the Moral Majority are in the late stages of the same process (and will likely lose most of their congregations within 40 years or so).

(I lucked into a biography of the Beecher family a few years back (The Beechers by Milton Rugoff) that was instructive in this regard. There's some eerie similarities between what that book describes and events in the modern fundamentalist/Evangelical scene. Henry Ward Beecher is the most obvious one - he would have fit just fine into a modern Prosperity Gospel megachurch, up to and including the lurid sex scandal - but there's also Lyman Beecher getting caught up in internal doctrinal squabbles and Thomas Beecher building a church that was basically the modern everything-for-everyone megachurch almost a century early.)

The thing is, the Fourth Great Awakening/New Age saw no major Christian denominations founded - AFAICT even the modern nondenominational churches trace their roots back to the Third - so if the pattern holds the next religious groups to tread those steps to oblivion will have to be non-Christian... in which case Wicca is the obvious candidate...

Stirrings of Neopagan Fundamentalism?

Date: 2018-08-26 08:32 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Hello, John. My husband and I have been involved with Wicca for almost 30 years, and we are so sorry this happened. :( This does not sound like the Wicca we've been involved with.
We were taught to value diversity. That means a variety of beliefs, rituals, and gods and goddesses worshiped should not only be allowed, but embraced. It saddens us that tolerance seems to be decreasing in Wicca. At a time of increased economic and political turmoil, the last thing Wiccans should be doing is criticizing other Pagans who follow different paths.
We've been reading your blogs since 2012, and have found them informative and enlightening. Thank you for all you do.
Sincerely,
Mike and Norma

(no subject)

Date: 2018-08-27 08:47 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I have absolutely no relevant experience here, but I do have one thought which I hope may not be entirely useless: It might just be an artefact of statistics. As Wicca becomes both more popular and more mainstream, it's inevitable that its adherents will become more and more like the general population, which sadly includes a fair number of intolerant idiots. It's important to remember that any sufficiently large group of people will always include its share of bams. (If I may indulge in the vernacular...)

Dunc

Wiccanate privilege

Date: 2018-08-27 02:35 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Hmmm. There was a kerfluffle a few years ago centering on one of the festivals (Pantheacon, perhaps?), in which reconstructionist pagans and hard polytheists complained about exclusion and Wiccanate privilege--the language of the public rituals and approach to the gods was highly monist or duotheistic, without sufficient room for those with a polytheistic or animistic approach (some of the polytheists claimed the rituals were disrespectful to their gods, even miasmic). It led to heated critique of the "big umbrella" approach to Paganism, and a number of public polytheists withdrawing from the broader community. I wonder if the flack you caught from this person is at all related to that battle--Sister Crow

Re: Wiccanate privilege

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2018-08-28 01:26 pm (UTC) - Expand

Similar issue from a montheist

Date: 2018-08-27 02:55 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I have a similar issue from an entirely different background. I'm a moderately conservative Muslim following the traditions of the Nimatullahi Sufi Order, as it exists primarily in Iran, although I am not a member of the order. My mother was member but I never actually joined. At least once a year I meet someone who claims to know all about this tradition, and usually the traditions that follow from Rumi as well, and then goes on to castigate me for my conservative attitude and my religious observance. Usually I ignore them. When I'm in a less forgiving mood I ask whether they are aware that that the founders of these traditions were quite conservative, well known scholars of Islamic law, and not at all inclined to liberal views of religion or social policy? In decades past the response was often curiosity but these days I get some actual hostility and even people who double down on their insistence that I'm wrong about my own tradition. All of this very odd since I'm not obviously religious myself and am more than happy to let them take whatever value and interpretation they want from these traditions. In fact the more lenient I am with them concerning their own interpretation the more hostility I usually receive.

I’m sorry :(

Date: 2018-08-28 07:28 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I started out as a “Wiccan” type Witch as a teen in the early ‘90s when there was plenty of beginner material laying around but not much advanced stuff that was specific to Wicca (though there was other advanced material everywhere- advanced folk magic, advanced ceremonial magic, advanced levels of most specialized skills like Tarot). Back then, there were complaints that a percentage of Wiccans wandered into ceremonial magic when they ran out of challenging practices in Wicca, so a few authors were beginning to offer more advanced works on Wicca. They didn’t publish material fast enough for me, so I wandered into the neopagan reconstructionists and never looked back. It leads me to speculate that maybe a lot more advanced works got written and created an echo chamber in the purely Wiccan faction of Wicca (perhaps those most virulently opposed to cultural appropriation).

I do value my Wiccan background though, because without a first step there would never have been a second step. And for this reason I apologize for your treatment from the bottom of my heart. To me, dogma sounds like the mirror opposite of a true pagan worldview and I don’t think it has a place in any polytheist religion (though it can sprout anywhere, I guess).

I can only speculate about the person’s motivations, but it sounds to me like the classic rookie mistake of assuming the first thing you read is the right way. I think I probably stumbled across my first bit of conflicting Occult information in the second book I read, promptly to have both books contradicted by the third. I don’t understand how anyone could study the Occult for any length of time and assume there is only one way to do anything. I suspect perhaps the author in question may have ego issues. I do not remember much material in early Wicca that was designed to “kill the ego” as you have called it (or even to put it down for a nap). Wicca is still a very young religion, it may take some time for the cream to rise. However, there are still
some incredibly wise and humble Wiccans out there, and you may not recognize them since they aren’t coming out of the woodwork to tell you how to magick.

The Pagan scene in the nearby cities does value diversity and our Chicago Pagan Pride organizer is a gem of a woman who clearly values diversity in religion. She is liberal but she is also open to alternate political views as well, which is a lot more rare. I am hoping the Heathen religions will balance the red and blue in the force ;) so that Pagans will remember to be tolerant of other political affiliations.

In rural areas , I’ve encountered more people who only identify as Witches and tend to study more magic and less religion. They are also influenced by Wicca but not dogmatic about it.

I do agree that generic Wiccan rituals can sometimes be utterly disappointing, especially if written or designed by relatively inexperienced practitioners. It starts to feel like the exact same ritual all over again. I think most festivals would benefit tremendously from a wider variety of rituals of various backgrounds. In some cases I think this may be a lack of volunteers, where the best practitioners and groves/covens have nothing to prove so the ones who lack experience or have character defects are overrepresented (like the loudest people are usually the ones with the least to say). I myself have led some *not great* rituals in the transition from “solitary ritual” to “inviting friends over for ritual” before learning how to scale things and how to help people participate who have no idea what’s going on. I don’t have confidence that I could lead a festival ritual with my current group (mostly because our total 3-5 people would need to be REALLY IMPRESSIVE to create effects dramatic enough to keep the attention of a festival size group, and we aren’t there yet!!! But in a festival of 10 people we could steal the show!!!!! Hahaha)

Wiccan book sales did peak in 2007, but it was the fastest growing religion in the 1990s so it makes sense that it would start to lose steam. I would like to know what the total numbers of Occultists and Pagans look like... are those total numbers still growing rapidly? I suspect Heathenism is growing a lot right now, based on seeing it nowhere 10 years ago to seeing it a lot now. I am hoping yes, and I hope it is part of a broader societal change rejecting scientific materialism.

I just want to end this by saying there are bad apples in every religion and it’s not fair to judge the whole of a religion by the behavior of its worst representatives (if we did that, we’d have to give up all the religions AND atheism.... an interesting trick if we could pull it off). I think the goals of Wicca are noble and its values are virtuous, even though sometimes some people screw up the execution. I think it will be a beautiful, powerful, vibrant religion in a hundred years, if it adjusts to a more modest rate of growth. Even if it falls in history’s dustbin, it has made some interesting and beautiful contributions to the Western Occultism, just like so many other traditions that have come and gone.

I’m terribly sorry that such a widely respected Archdruid and mage has suffered such undignified treatment, and I am saddened that the bad behaviors of a few people are tarnishing the reputation of other Wiccans. I sincerely hope that wisdom prevails in more and more of humanity’s interactions in the future, and I hope that the wise elders of the Wiccan community clamp down on this sort of behavior before it does any more damage.

Very sincerely,
Jessi Thompson
anotheramethyst

Wiccan style public ritual

Date: 2018-08-29 02:07 am (UTC)
ritaer: rare photo of me (Default)
From: [personal profile] ritaer
Inspired by Steve Jackson's GURP (generic universal role playing) I came up with the term GUP for what one usually sees in public rituals. Generic universal Paganism--people in a circle; circle 'cast' with one or more circumnavigations with various tools; invocations of some entity, element, etc. at the four directions; sometimes an invocation of 'the center' or spirit or ancestors; invocation of a deity pair (usually male/female) occasionally two or more aspects of same deity; some seasonal, rite of passage (dedications of newcomers, marriages, baby blessing, land blessing or other celebratory work; sometimes a group raising of energy to be directed toward a magical purpose; blessing and distribution of food and drink; dismissal of whatever was invoked at quarters; some symbolic dispersal of the circle.

Rituals of this general pattern can be well done and moving. They can be poorly done and excruciatingly boring. Some try to branch out from Wiccan to other polytheisms without understanding that the circle is not universal for religious workings. Then you get what I call 'flavored GUP'--use Greek names for the winds at the quarters, invoke Aphrodite and Mars and serve barley bread and wine and presto, you are a Greek Pagan. Meanwhile the Hellenismos in the audience are grinding their teeth. Or let's get eclectic and invoke Quan-yin in the east, some Shango in the south, White Buffalo Woman in the north and Bridget in the west and make everyone cringe and duck for cover. Then the Wiccans wander into an Norse seidth and want to know why the circle hasn't been cast. Because seidth workers don't use circles, that's why. I've seen this reaction. I was also at the Pantheacon in which the wiccanate discussion took place. What a bunch of people talking past each other.
As for lack of published advanced Wiccan materials--the usual reason given is that the advanced material is oath-bound. Which is true. But it is also true that many covens and the traditions they come from don't have a distinct body of advanced material. What you learn depends much on the interests of your HPS. Train with an astrologer and you will be told to cast and delineate your chart. Train with a gardener and you will be out learning to grow your own vervain, etc.

Rita

Re: Wiccan style public ritual

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2018-08-29 07:53 am (UTC) - Expand

Goofy sufis

Date: 2018-08-28 12:29 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Some of the Goofy Sufis have great ideas, which I think were borrowed from pagan traditions but, alas Sufism it is not. The bitterness is, perhaps, a result of the fact most of the slightly hostile responses come from people who aren't willing or can't be bothered to do what would be necessary to understand the tradition. I'm wholly with them, that's why I never formally joined. Learning classical Persian and Arabic, reading arcane texts that don't mean what they appear to probably in your third language, etc. Sounds familiar.

Profile

ecosophia: (Default)John Michael Greer

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45 67 8 910
1112 131415 1617
1819 2021 22 2324
2526 27282930 31

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 8th, 2025 01:39 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »