ecosophia: (Default)
[personal profile] ecosophia
walking up hillsThe pandemic has been scrubbed from the front pages at this point and replaced by a different hysteria du jour, but the semi-open posts  I've hosted here on the Covid-19 narrative, the inadequately tested experimental drugs for it, and the whole cascading mess surrounding them have continued to field a steady stream of comments, so I'm opening yet another space for discussion. The rules are the same as before: 

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry et al. are causing injury and death. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its tame politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here. 
 
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue. 

4. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules. 

With that said, as the vaccinated keep catching Covid (and many of them never quite seem to get over it) while the rest of us are fine, the floor is open for discussion. 

Re: WHO treaty

Date: 2022-04-13 04:10 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
It doesn't much matter anyway, what the little people say. But, just occasionally, pitchforks early goes a long way in nerfing an "entangling alliance". Better an ounce of preventions than try and get out later. TPP anyone? Son of Nafta is STILL making a giant sucking sound. Are we not debating at this moment whether, just maybe, it's ok for NATO to consider tactical nukes? Treaties aren't THAT easy to break, without political cover from pitchforks.

It's a nation to nation treaty, for now. The whole point of these 'crisis' we are living through is to make these Extra-National bodies more powerful and able to arm-twist nations. Lot's of procedural buraucratese is being lodged in place so it's good to go when they want to flip the switch. After, of course, multi-year and multi-stage semi-engagement.

Re: WHO treaty

Date: 2022-04-13 03:20 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] hearthspirit
Yeah. I'd hoped it wouldn't come to the arm twisting.

Yet I somehow still never fail to be surprised by the need.
Page generated May. 25th, 2025 04:15 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »