This is a post on RFK from UK anti-vax activist Miri Anne Finch who was 'activated' after coming to the US and being heavily coerced into taking a measles vaccine by an American University which threatened to deport her if she didn't comply: https://miriaf.co.uk/rfk-mmr-wtf/
Via her post on RFK we receive a succinct statement of the anti-vax position:
"RFK is really very explicit that this is his goal: "I am not “anti-vaccine”. I want safe vaccines."
And what's wrong with that position?
Well, first of all, there is no such thing: a powerful chemical injection can never be made "safe", only "safer". Some will still get side effects, some of them severe, and some will still die from these effects.
Yet even that is sidestepping a much more critical and fundamental issue: are childhood vaccines either necessary or desirable?
First of all, do they work, and if they do, is what they're achieving actually something we want to promote?
The answer to these questions - and as any honest researcher eventually finds when they go deep enough into the vaccine vortex - is no, and no.
Vaccines do not "work", because the fundamental assumption they are based on is demonstrably false, e.g., that the creation of antibody titres equates to immunity to disease.
When a vaccine is said to be "effective", this is not measured by whether it consistently prevents recipients from developing the condition in question, but rather, by whether it provokes the production of antibody titres in the blood.
As the authorities finally admitted during "Covid", antibody titres don't actually equate to immunity from disease (that's why we were relentlessly told that, even if we'd had "Covid" and thus "had antibodies", we still needed to get endlessly injected - because antibodies to a condition don't mean you're immune to it).
So vaccines don't work, because all they do is create antibodies, and antibodies don't equate to immunity.
But further than that, would it be desirable for them to work?To be clear: is preventing routine childhood illnesses something we actually want to do?
The overwhelming body of evidence says, NO.
These conditions are called "routine", and nature meant all children to pass through them, for a reason.
When children go through the process of measles or mumps or chicken pox, their bodies are undergoing powerful detoxes, throwing off toxic loads that may have been inherited from parents or accrued from other environmental sources. The evidence is very clear that going through these illnesses renders children overall less toxic, as they become less susceptible to toxicity-related conditions, like cancer and heart disease, later on.
What vaccines appear to do - why they create the illusion of "working" insofar as most children who have received e.g., a measles vaccine don't go on to contract measles - is suppress detox pathways, so toxicity that was meant to leave the body, stays trapped inside it instead, manifesting in much more serious ways later on.
In short, it isn't just the additional "crap" in vaccines undermining national health - it is the very mechanism of vaccinating itself, and stopping children from developing measles and other short-lived childhood ailments is actively harming their health."
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
Miri AF on RFK
Date: 2025-05-07 02:35 pm (UTC)Via her post on RFK we receive a succinct statement of the anti-vax position:
"RFK is really very explicit that this is his goal: "I am not “anti-vaccine”. I want safe vaccines."
And what's wrong with that position?
Well, first of all, there is no such thing: a powerful chemical injection can never be made "safe", only "safer". Some will still get side effects, some of them severe, and some will still die from these effects.
Yet even that is sidestepping a much more critical and fundamental issue: are childhood vaccines either necessary or desirable?
First of all, do they work, and if they do, is what they're achieving actually something we want to promote?
The answer to these questions - and as any honest researcher eventually finds when they go deep enough into the vaccine vortex - is no, and no.
Vaccines do not "work", because the fundamental assumption they are based on is demonstrably false, e.g., that the creation of antibody titres equates to immunity to disease.
When a vaccine is said to be "effective", this is not measured by whether it consistently prevents recipients from developing the condition in question, but rather, by whether it provokes the production of antibody titres in the blood.
As the authorities finally admitted during "Covid", antibody titres don't actually equate to immunity from disease (that's why we were relentlessly told that, even if we'd had "Covid" and thus "had antibodies", we still needed to get endlessly injected - because antibodies to a condition don't mean you're immune to it).
So vaccines don't work, because all they do is create antibodies, and antibodies don't equate to immunity.
But further than that, would it be desirable for them to work?To be clear: is preventing routine childhood illnesses something we actually want to do?
The overwhelming body of evidence says, NO.
These conditions are called "routine", and nature meant all children to pass through them, for a reason.
When children go through the process of measles or mumps or chicken pox, their bodies are undergoing powerful detoxes, throwing off toxic loads that may have been inherited from parents or accrued from other environmental sources. The evidence is very clear that going through these illnesses renders children overall less toxic, as they become less susceptible to toxicity-related conditions, like cancer and heart disease, later on.
What vaccines appear to do - why they create the illusion of "working" insofar as most children who have received e.g., a measles vaccine don't go on to contract measles - is suppress detox pathways, so toxicity that was meant to leave the body, stays trapped inside it instead, manifesting in much more serious ways later on.
In short, it isn't just the additional "crap" in vaccines undermining national health - it is the very mechanism of vaccinating itself, and stopping children from developing measles and other short-lived childhood ailments is actively harming their health."