I'm very deeply struck by the coherence in events described by these various charts. The eclipse on the day of the electoral college, and then the Grand Mutation, and then this horrific inauguration chart.
Rather these charts seem to me, including the Grand Mutation Chart, to cluster around issues of illegitimacy of the government, and to consistently suggest a narrow avoidance of hot warfare. Taken together, I imagine that we're looking at the basic shredding of the legitimacy of the current forms of government, with new forms more appropriate to the zeitgeist of the new era of world history.
Now, obviously I'm not personally pleased with that. That said, something that I found very rewarding about the study of historical astrology is the deep sense of a deeper casualty at play. That is, the eloquent narrative coherence that the charts create often with uncanny coincidences. While I don't like fatalism, it seems to me incredible that all of these charts point to the same basic outcomes for the nation. In the 1860's there was going to be war, and the stars in 1859 said that with eerie clarity. In the 2020's there will be a crisis of legitimacy and very likely partition, or at least that's how I read the stars. That said, I've not yet seen anything at all like what led up to the US Civil War, so I suspect that the outcomes will differ accordingly.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
(no subject)
Date: 2020-11-17 10:46 pm (UTC)I'm very deeply struck by the coherence in events described by these various charts. The eclipse on the day of the electoral college, and then the Grand Mutation, and then this horrific inauguration chart.
When I studied the mundane astrology of the year leading up to the US Civil War I was struck by just the same sort of eloquence, the same sense of a repeating pattern. With the US Civil War, just to be clear, the planet that kept on expressing himself over and over again was Mars. With these charts, I don't detect the same sort of coherence regarding War, obviously. for an example of some of these charts and interpretation here's a link: https://violetcabra.dreamwidth.org/tag/civil+war+astrology+project and another: https://violetcabra.dreamwidth.org/34046.html
Rather these charts seem to me, including the Grand Mutation Chart, to cluster around issues of illegitimacy of the government, and to consistently suggest a narrow avoidance of hot warfare. Taken together, I imagine that we're looking at the basic shredding of the legitimacy of the current forms of government, with new forms more appropriate to the zeitgeist of the new era of world history.
Now, obviously I'm not personally pleased with that. That said, something that I found very rewarding about the study of historical astrology is the deep sense of a deeper casualty at play. That is, the eloquent narrative coherence that the charts create often with uncanny coincidences. While I don't like fatalism, it seems to me incredible that all of these charts point to the same basic outcomes for the nation. In the 1860's there was going to be war, and the stars in 1859 said that with eerie clarity. In the 2020's there will be a crisis of legitimacy and very likely partition, or at least that's how I read the stars. That said, I've not yet seen anything at all like what led up to the US Civil War, so I suspect that the outcomes will differ accordingly.