ecosophia: (Default)
[personal profile] ecosophia
ADF logo(With thanks to reader Lady Cutekitten for the title)

I've been asked by several readers over on the blog about the recent blowup in the Druid organization ADF (that's Ar nDraiocht Fein if you're wondering, Irish for "Our Own Druidry") and, since that's not relevant to the theme of this week's blog post, I figured I'd take the discussion over here. 

What I know about the matter is this. In a book published several years ago, a woman accused the late Neopagan leader and ADF founder Isaac Bonewits of molesting her when she was a child of six. Two weeks ago, five senior ADF members abruptly resigned, citing the lack of responsiveness to that accusation as one of a long list of reasons for their resignation. Last week the Mother Grove -- the board of directors of the organization -- announced that they were formally repudiating Bonewits, dismissing him from his posthumous role of "Beloved Ancestor." The Mother Grove claimed that they had received other accusations of misbehavior on Bonewits' part and cited these as reasons for their actions. The result has been a great deal of anger and bad feeling on all sides, with one side arguing that concern for victims of sexual abuse should be paramount,  while the other argues that condemning him without a trial on the basis of mere accusation is exactly the modality of the "Satanic ritual abuse" fraud of the 1980s, which destroyed so many innocent people's lives. 

Myself, I have no dog in this fight. I joined ADF just after the turn of the millennium, and quit shaking my head a few years later; I thought the ritual and religious aspects of the organization had a great deal of promise but the organizational structure was the most dysfunctional I'd ever seen in action -- it's no exaggeration to say that Bonewits and the other founding members came up with a scheme that combines all the downsides of hierarchy and democracy, while providing none of the advantages of either. I had several interactions with Isaac Bonewits later on, when I was head of AODA, and we were civil to each other but I won't claim that I liked the man; it was kind of hard to forget that he spent much of his career spewing insults at the kind of Druidry I love and practice.

With regard to the accusations against him, that's not something I'm qualified to assess. I do know that quite literally every time I was around him for more than a minute or so, I got to watch him trying to put the moves on some woman, and I don't recall ever seeing him take a simple "no" for an answer. The guy was frankly a creep. On the other hand, I never saw him make a play for anyone who wasn't obviously adult.

Whatever the truth of that issue, though, on a magical level ADF has probably signed its own death certificate. You don't turn somebody into a "Beloved Ancestor" and spend a decade making offerings to his spirit, then suddenly turn around and give him the bum's rush -- especially when you've made him a central figure in the ritual for ADF's attempt to create an initiatory tradition. (That's a flustered cluck all its own, but we can leave it aside for now.) That's perhaps the most effective way I can think of to create a wrathful spirit: empowered by a decade of offerings, linked closely to the egregor of your organization, and now enraged by the organization's 180-degree turn...oog. Whatever ADF's principal fissures are -- I have my guesses, but we'll see -- I'd expect to see the organization splitting wide open along those in the very near future. 

It's unfortunate. As I noted above, the ritual and religious aspects of the organization were quite good, and if they hadn't been saddled with a great deal of unhelpful organizational baggage, ADF might have been around for the long haul. As it is, with the Neopagan movement generally in a state of accelerating decline, I expect to see it added to the long list of defunct American alternative spiritual movements in the not too distant future. 

(no subject)

Date: 2019-11-16 02:53 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Hi JMG,

Mentioning Francis (mumble mumble mumble) gave me an idea. Suppose instead of posthumously ousting Bonewits, they’d kept him but acknowledged him being the equivalent of a bad pope? Instead of calling him Beloved Ancestor, call him Jerk Who Nevertheless Founded The Organization? Would that avert the bad consequences you cited? Or is it like with (mumble mumble) Francis, what Bonewits did was so egregious he done trashed the whole egregor and there’s no choice but to start over from scratch?

For persons who wonder why Francis is worse than the bad popes, it’s because they did not attack the Church itself, they did not attack Church teaching on faith and morals. Francis did.

—Lady Cutekitten

(no subject)

Date: 2019-11-16 08:05 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Your Ladyship,

Obviously you've got a serious beef with Francis, have you written more anywhere on what exactly it is that you disagree with? I'm serious and just plain interested. I'm not going to argue with you about it.

Chris

(no subject)

Date: 2019-11-17 12:20 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
(mumble mumble)

A lot of Roman Catholics have a serious beef with Francis. We think he should either become a Catholic or resign the papacy.

Rod Dreher at American Conservative has gone into Francis’s un-Papal conduct in exhaustive detail. He has a wider view of the whole mess than I have, as he was first a Methodist or Baptist, I forget which, then a Catholic, now Russian Orthodox.

(no subject)

Date: 2019-11-17 12:55 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] deborah_bender
That seems to have worked for the OTO (Ordo Templi Orientis), which Aleister Crowley did not found but did make over in his own image. At the time Crowley died, the OTO was in decline, and Crowley's formal successor for the remnant bodies in the US (Karl Germer) did not initiate new members, but after Germer died, Grady McMurtry formed an active Grand Lodge and the organization has been a going concern in the several decades since.

Pope Francis

Date: 2019-11-17 02:02 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Lady Cutekitten - How old is Pope Francis? He started out strong, but the came a time he seemed to start dithering, and it occurs to me he may be in the early stages (or maybe not so early now)of losing it.

Re: Pope Francis

Date: 2019-11-17 04:33 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
He was born in 1936, so he’s certainly in a prime age group for dementia, but his sermons, pronouncements, etc. seem coherent enough. They’re just usually not very Christian.

Re: Pope Francis

Date: 2019-11-17 03:27 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Pope Francis is 82 years old. So it's very possible his health is
starting to deteriorate. He also has an underlying condition that
doesn't seem to get mentioned very often. He has only one lung, having
lost the other to an infection early in his life. Most people can function
well with one lung, though they may be more vulnerable if respiratory issues
crop up as they age.

JLfromNH
Page generated Jun. 11th, 2025 03:35 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »