I wish I knew how to communicate how hare-brained all this stuff you treat as natural and unproblematic is. It's like if someone was trying to emulate a PlayStation game with a Nintendo 64 emulator, which was compiled for Linux, but they were trying to run it on a version of Windows that was compiled for a PC x86 processor, which they were trying to use on a Macintosh with a 680x0 processor, installed on an IDE external hard disk which they had "connected" to the SCSI port on the Mac using a custom-soldered RS232 cable, and the Mac had a power adapter designed for American 120V which they'd hammered into shape so they could plug it into one of the live pins and the ground pin of a European outlet with 240V, and also they custom-soldered a token ring network coaxial cable to "connect" the AppleTalk port on one end to a Ethernet switch on the other, and also they were trying to insert the PlayStation disc into the floppy disc drive, and also then they told you they had an HDMI monitor they wanted to use and were considering pulling out the internal display connection and soldering A/V cables to some of the pins...

The forces in question are, one supposes, more flexible than that, but I don't know how else to convey how disorienting it is to try to follow all this stuff whose unproblematic juxtaposability you take for granted. The experts (or, more likely, middle-of-the-road professional practitioners) you are consulting with probably don't have the experience needed to make engineering judgements about the interacting systems; it's hard enough to make good judgements even within just one system, or to notice when you're missing something.

The only kind of "expert" with knowledge relevant to your current setup that is likely to be accessible to you is an experienced chaos magic practitioner, and unless they had an uncanny intuition for how to make space for the elements to interact safely, maybe they would tell you to tone it down too.

Also, running lighting and irrigation through particular geometric patterns is just, like, a static invocation, it doesn't necessarily have much power or flexibility by itself. I'm not sure cables that have electric power going through them are that healthy for this kind of purpose either, even assuming that the geometric arrangement of conductive cables that didn't have electrical currents might have been useful for something.

Like JMG said in the other thread ( https://ecosophia.dreamwidth.org/236505.html?thread=41517785#cmt41543385 ): "It's like trying to carry on conversations in two different languages at the same time -- things tend to get garbled." If everyone knows what they're doing, then maybe it works, but...

You're mixing, I'm not even sure how to count that many subsystems:

- a chakra-associated energy
  - specified by a manadala
    - as part of the Devi-Krishnamurti system
      - invoked with a geometric shape of where the lights are
- chi
  - according to theories of feng shui
    - along dragon lines (previously existing ones? identified how? with what degree of confidence?)
      - using cables carrying electrical currents (????)
- another chakra-associated energy
  - specified by patterns found in a kshetram (i.e. not from the same system of mandalas as the mandala)
    - invoked with a geometric shape of where the plants are
- "energy"
  - according to an "Erinite" theory of ley lines (never heard of this, but it sure sounds like a different system from feng shui!)
    - including a directional association to invoke Qinglong
      - using a pattern of water tubes
- other directional guardian influences
  - using hanging crystals
    - (why all chalcedony? is it supposed to be general-purpose like frankincense or something?)
- seriously considered the suggestion of Vedic lunar mansion influences
  - using 12 more hanging crystals
    - in a "refractive orrery" pattern
      - (that's, like, 50 degrees of freedom in the design, how would you even begin to calibrate the crystal sizes and alignments and orrery gear ratios if you can't perceive the forces or ostensible "refraction" events involved in the first place, and also they're qualitative and symbolic and substantially observer-dependent?)

You should probably surrender some of your attachments to your ideas about how your intentions interact with the forces that are interpreting your invocatory actions.

More generally, having true beliefs is like tending a garden, or at least a crystal garden. And you seem like the kind of person who would figuratively let too many volunteer plants or crystals grow in the wrong shapes and places, without correctly transplanting, pruning, or destroying them. And not all of the volunteers are even useful plants/crystals; some are weeds, or parasitic side reactions, like if the useful polymorph of calcium carbonate is aragonite and you're getting the calcite polymorph instead, in which case you should remove the calcite seed crystals and re-dissolve them and change the conditions in the growth medium.

You may be figuratively experiencing your crystals being numerous and well-defined and vivid, and be proud of the many, many sharp edges your crystal growth medium is able to maintain. But that isn't, in this case, a marker of success. (If you learn the correct spelling of a bunch of words that are hard to spell correctly, and then go out of your way to artificially include lots of those words in your writing correctly spelled, likewise that doesn't make it into good writing.) Ideally, the influences on the garden from your observations and reflections should be controlled in focus and magnitude, so that the sizes of the things in the garden within gradually come to only match the strength of the information arriving from the garden without, and not outgrow it. Your beliefs arising from the state of the garden within, on what might happen under given circumstances in the garden without, should be proportionately unconfident, with betting odds neither too long nor too short. If that's not happening, then your actions flowing back from the garden within are likely to create a dysfunctional garden without.

Chipped teeth and small fires may be just a warning. Psychiatric hospitalization is a bigger warning, if one aimed less at you. (Though, note well: so far as you understand, the way he got there was by *mixing* the wrong chemical influences! If you want a better fate than your teacher, succeed at the virtues he failed at!) Forces are ending up in the wrong places. Maybe invoke fewer, or all from just one system, or more weakly or with more uncertainty, and give them more license to ground out by some safe path if it turns out the thing you wanted didn't actually make sense in the contexts that only they currently can perceive. (In your place, if I had the budget, if I didn't walk back any of your other infrastructure-based invocations, I would at least go out of my way to replace the temperature control system with one of those ones that uses water run into the earth and back for its thermal reservoir.)

You should be self-aware about this, and regard the whole garden with a sort of bemused detachment that keeps there from being any drama about it. That might help the garden prune itself more, since beliefs grow towards emotional investment.

I guess there's also the question of whether your customers are observing appropriate taboos and sacrednesses given all the weird charging that you're doing on your plants. You might want to make an outgoing process that makes your plants more predictably safe for ordinary human amounts of fecklessness.

Someone here mentioned once that there is a temple of Saturn in India still. The Western tradition says that cannabis is a Saturnine herb. Also that there are strong Shaivite contemplative traditions around cannabis. Maybe you should switch over to full Indian techniques and then follow more of whatever is going on with those two things.